Discussion:
ACIM L240 "Fear is not justified in any form." ~ August 28 (iambic pentameter)
(too old to reply)
Lee Flynn
2011-08-28 13:29:52 UTC
Permalink
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28

http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson240.htm
http://www.acimradio.net/urwork/


" Lesson 240 October 16, 1970

"Fear is not justified in any form."

- Fear is deception. It attests that you
have seen yourself as you could never be,
and therefore look upon a world which is
impossible. Not one thing in [that] world
is true. It does not matter what the form
in which it may appear. It witnesses
but to your own illusions of yourself.
Let us not be deceived today. We are
the Son of God. There is no fear in us,
for we are each a part of Love Itself.

- "How foolish are our fears! Would You allow
Your Son to suffer? Give us faith today
to recognize Your Son and set him free.
Let us forgive him in Your Name, that we
may understand his holiness, and feel
the love for him that is Your own as well." "

~ Original Handscript of ACIM

------------------------------------------

[ Hear Today's Lesson in I.P. ~ Voice & Music by Maz ]

http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/240_UrWork_FearIsNotJustifiedInAnyForm.wma
or via http://www.youtube.com/sonshippress
Mike
2011-08-28 14:31:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson240.htmhttp://www.acimradio.net/urwork/
 " Lesson 240         October 16, 1970
   "Fear is not justified in any form."
 - Fear is deception. It attests that you
   have seen yourself as you could never be,
   and therefore look upon a world which is
   impossible. Not one thing in [that] world
   is true. It does not matter what the form
   in which it may appear. It witnesses
   but to your own illusions of yourself.
   Let us not be deceived today. We are
   the Son of God. There is no fear in us,
   for we are each a part of Love Itself.
 - "How foolish are our fears! Would You allow
    Your Son to suffer? Give us faith today
    to recognize Your Son and set him free.
    Let us forgive him in Your Name, that we
    may understand his holiness, and feel
    the love for him that is Your own as well." "
   ~ Original Handscript of ACIM
         ------------------------------------------
[ Hear Today's Lesson in I.P. ~ Voice & Music by Maz ]
http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/240_UrWork_FearIsNotJustifiedInAnyForm.wma
   or via  http://www.youtube.com/sonshippress
Hey, Lee, how are you? Question: Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM? You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)
Carrie
2011-08-30 20:35:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson240.htmhttp://www.acimradio.net/urwork/
" Lesson 240 October 16, 1970
"Fear is not justified in any form."
- Fear is deception. It attests that you
have seen yourself as you could never be,
and therefore look upon a world which is
impossible. Not one thing in [that] world
is true. It does not matter what the form
in which it may appear. It witnesses
but to your own illusions of yourself.
Let us not be deceived today. We are
the Son of God. There is no fear in us,
for we are each a part of Love Itself.
- "How foolish are our fears! Would You allow
Your Son to suffer? Give us faith today
to recognize Your Son and set him free.
Let us forgive him in Your Name, that we
may understand his holiness, and feel
the love for him that is Your own as well." "
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
------------------------------------------
[ Hear Today's Lesson in I.P. ~ Voice & Music by Maz ]
http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/240_UrWork_FearIsNotJustifiedInAnyForm.wma
or via http://www.youtube.com/sonshippress
Hey, Lee, how are you? Question: Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM? You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)

I thought Lee changed it into that. It's not like that in the blue books,
that were edited and published and the ones meant to be used. I prefer it,
that way (like in the blue books) it's more flowing and less choppy.
Pieter
2011-08-31 18:39:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson240.htmhttp://www.acimradio.net/urwork/
" Lesson 240 October 16, 1970
"Fear is not justified in any form."
- Fear is deception. It attests that you
have seen yourself as you could never be,
and therefore look upon a world which is
impossible. Not one thing in [that] world
is true. It does not matter what the form
in which it may appear. It witnesses
but to your own illusions of yourself.
Let us not be deceived today. We are
the Son of God. There is no fear in us,
for we are each a part of Love Itself.
- "How foolish are our fears! Would You allow
Your Son to suffer? Give us faith today
to recognize Your Son and set him free.
Let us forgive him in Your Name, that we
may understand his holiness, and feel
the love for him that is Your own as well." "
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
------------------------------------------
[ Hear Today's Lesson in I.P. ~ Voice & Music by Maz ]
http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/240_UrWork_FearIsNotJustifiedInAnyForm.wma
or via http://www.youtube.com/sonshippress
Hey, Lee, how are you? Question: Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM? You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)
I thought Lee changed it into that. It's not like that in the blue
books, that were edited and published and the ones meant to be used. I
prefer it, that way (like in the blue books) it's more flowing and less
choppy.
As for me: I very much appreciate the surplus value.
Carrie
2011-09-01 21:37:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pieter
Post by Mike
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson240.htmhttp://www.acimradio.net/urwork/
" Lesson 240 October 16, 1970
"Fear is not justified in any form."
- Fear is deception. It attests that you
have seen yourself as you could never be,
and therefore look upon a world which is
impossible. Not one thing in [that] world
is true. It does not matter what the form
in which it may appear. It witnesses
but to your own illusions of yourself.
Let us not be deceived today. We are
the Son of God. There is no fear in us,
for we are each a part of Love Itself.
- "How foolish are our fears! Would You allow
Your Son to suffer? Give us faith today
to recognize Your Son and set him free.
Let us forgive him in Your Name, that we
may understand his holiness, and feel
the love for him that is Your own as well." "
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
------------------------------------------
[ Hear Today's Lesson in I.P. ~ Voice & Music by Maz ]
http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/240_UrWork_FearIsNotJustifiedInAnyForm.wma
or via http://www.youtube.com/sonshippress
Hey, Lee, how are you? Question: Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM? You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)
I thought Lee changed it into that. It's not like that in the blue
books, that were edited and published and the ones meant to be used. I
prefer it, that way (like in the blue books) it's more flowing and less
choppy.
As for me: I very much appreciate the surplus value.
I'm not sure what they means, but I still think the idea is to believe
it, experience it and use it.
Format is... well form.
Pieter
2011-09-02 14:41:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Carrie
Post by Pieter
As for me: I very much appreciate the surplus value.
I'm not sure what they means, but I still think the idea is to believe
it, experience it and use it.
Format is... well form.
Sure . . . just as the words itself are form.
For us who live in form and space and time,
which we experience as our reality, form is
needed to get a message across.
For me the pleasant readability is helpful.
I love the fluency. It helps me overlooking form.
Carrie
2011-09-02 14:48:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pieter
Post by Carrie
Post by Pieter
As for me: I very much appreciate the surplus value.
I'm not sure what they means, but I still think the idea is to believe
it, experience it and use it.
Format is... well form.
Sure . . . just as the words itself are form.
For us who live in form and space and time,
which we experience as our reality, form is
needed to get a message across.
For me the pleasant readability is helpful.
I love the fluency. It helps me overlooking form.
I think I tend to get distracted by the words "iambic pentameter" Lee
puts on all the lessons he posts. Like THAT is the most important part of
the words, the format it's in. And the original way it was edited and
published (given to the world) is somehow wrong. I know, it's my
distraction. I also have the choice of not looking at the newsgroup (in case
someone actually is interested in "discussion"- and if so, in a peaceful,
sharing way.) I know, it's always MY lessons...
Mike
2011-09-01 15:51:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson240.htmhttp...
" Lesson 240 October 16, 1970
"Fear is not justified in any form."
- Fear is deception. It attests that you
have seen yourself as you could never be,
and therefore look upon a world which is
impossible. Not one thing in [that] world
is true. It does not matter what the form
in which it may appear. It witnesses
but to your own illusions of yourself.
Let us not be deceived today. We are
the Son of God. There is no fear in us,
for we are each a part of Love Itself.
- "How foolish are our fears! Would You allow
Your Son to suffer? Give us faith today
to recognize Your Son and set him free.
Let us forgive him in Your Name, that we
may understand his holiness, and feel
the love for him that is Your own as well." "
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
------------------------------------------
[ Hear Today's Lesson in I.P. ~ Voice & Music by Maz ]
http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/240_UrWork_FearIsNotJustifiedInAnyForm.wma
or viahttp://www.youtube.com/sonshippress
Hey, Lee, how are you?  Question:  Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM?  You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)
   I thought Lee changed it into that. It's not like that in the blue books,
that were edited and published and the ones meant to be used. I prefer it,
that way (like in the blue books) it's more flowing and less choppy.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
What, huh, what? How could Lee change it to iambic pentameter? I
am trying to find out where the first instance of iambic pentameter is
found in ACIM. Why, you wonder. Because the iambic pentameter
sentences cannot be edited. Very important.
Deborah
2011-09-01 17:24:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson240.htmhttp...
" Lesson 240 October 16, 1970
"Fear is not justified in any form."
- Fear is deception. It attests that you
have seen yourself as you could never be,
and therefore look upon a world which is
impossible. Not one thing in [that] world
is true. It does not matter what the form
in which it may appear. It witnesses
but to your own illusions of yourself.
Let us not be deceived today. We are
the Son of God. There is no fear in us,
for we are each a part of Love Itself.
- "How foolish are our fears! Would You allow
Your Son to suffer? Give us faith today
to recognize Your Son and set him free.
Let us forgive him in Your Name, that we
may understand his holiness, and feel
the love for him that is Your own as well." "
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
------------------------------------------
[ Hear Today's Lesson in I.P. ~ Voice & Music by Maz ]
http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/240_UrWork_FearIsNotJustifiedInAnyForm.wma
or viahttp://www.youtube.com/sonshippress
Hey, Lee, how are you?  Question:  Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM?  You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)
   I thought Lee changed it into that. It's not like that in the blue books,
that were edited and published and the ones meant to be used. I prefer it,
that way (like in the blue books) it's more flowing and less choppy.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
What, huh, what? How could Lee change it to iambic pentameter? I
am trying to find out where the first instance of iambic pentameter is
found in ACIM. Why, you wonder. Because the iambic pentameter
sentences cannot be edited. Very important.
I agree. I would be interested, too. I'd also be interested in
knowing where it begins to be *consistently* iambic pentamenter. I
vaguely recall Lee saying it was not until around Ch 10, but I could
be mistaken.
Mike
2011-09-02 21:14:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson240.htmhttp...
" Lesson 240 October 16, 1970
"Fear is not justified in any form."
- Fear is deception. It attests that you
have seen yourself as you could never be,
and therefore look upon a world which is
impossible. Not one thing in [that] world
is true. It does not matter what the form
in which it may appear. It witnesses
but to your own illusions of yourself.
Let us not be deceived today. We are
the Son of God. There is no fear in us,
for we are each a part of Love Itself.
- "How foolish are our fears! Would You allow
Your Son to suffer? Give us faith today
to recognize Your Son and set him free.
Let us forgive him in Your Name, that we
may understand his holiness, and feel
the love for him that is Your own as well." "
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
------------------------------------------
[ Hear Today's Lesson in I.P. ~ Voice & Music by Maz ]
http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/240_UrWork_FearIsNotJustifiedInAnyForm.wma
or viahttp://www.youtube.com/sonshippress
Hey, Lee, how are you?  Question:  Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM?  You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)
   I thought Lee changed it into that. It's not like that in the blue books,
that were edited and published and the ones meant to be used. I prefer it,
that way (like in the blue books) it's more flowing and less choppy.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
 What, huh, what?  How could Lee change it to iambic pentameter?  I
am trying to find out where the first instance of iambic pentameter is
found in ACIM.  Why, you wonder.  Because the iambic pentameter
sentences cannot be edited.  Very important.
I agree.  I would be interested, too.  I'd also be interested in
knowing where it begins to be *consistently* iambic pentamenter.  I
vaguely recall Lee saying it was not until around Ch 10, but I could
be mistaken.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hi, Deb. That is what I want to know, too. Where iambic pentameter
begins as a matter of course. How you been?
Carrie
2011-09-01 21:39:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson240.htmhttp...
" Lesson 240 October 16, 1970
"Fear is not justified in any form."
- Fear is deception. It attests that you
have seen yourself as you could never be,
and therefore look upon a world which is
impossible. Not one thing in [that] world
is true. It does not matter what the form
in which it may appear. It witnesses
but to your own illusions of yourself.
Let us not be deceived today. We are
the Son of God. There is no fear in us,
for we are each a part of Love Itself.
- "How foolish are our fears! Would You allow
Your Son to suffer? Give us faith today
to recognize Your Son and set him free.
Let us forgive him in Your Name, that we
may understand his holiness, and feel
the love for him that is Your own as well." "
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
------------------------------------------
[ Hear Today's Lesson in I.P. ~ Voice & Music by Maz ]
http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/240_UrWork_FearIsNotJustifiedInAnyForm.wma
or viahttp://www.youtube.com/sonshippress
Hey, Lee, how are you? Question: Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM? You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)
I thought Lee changed it into that. It's not like that in the blue books,
that were edited and published and the ones meant to be used. I prefer it,
that way (like in the blue books) it's more flowing and less choppy.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
What, huh, what? How could Lee change it to iambic pentameter? I
am trying to find out where the first instance of iambic pentameter is
found in ACIM. Why, you wonder. Because the iambic pentameter
sentences cannot be edited. Very important.

If Lee didn't change it to iambic pentameter why does he have to
announced that is what it's written in (now) when he posts the lessons?
I find the lessons online and in the files I have, and they are, well,
just words.
If they were orginally written in I.P. why not just post it that way
without the announcement?
Carrie
2011-09-01 21:51:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson240.htmhttp...
" Lesson 240 October 16, 1970
"Fear is not justified in any form."
- Fear is deception. It attests that you
have seen yourself as you could never be,
and therefore look upon a world which is
impossible. Not one thing in [that] world
is true. It does not matter what the form
in which it may appear. It witnesses
but to your own illusions of yourself.
Let us not be deceived today. We are
the Son of God. There is no fear in us,
for we are each a part of Love Itself.
- "How foolish are our fears! Would You allow
Your Son to suffer? Give us faith today
to recognize Your Son and set him free.
Let us forgive him in Your Name, that we
may understand his holiness, and feel
the love for him that is Your own as well." "
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
------------------------------------------
[ Hear Today's Lesson in I.P. ~ Voice & Music by Maz ]
http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/240_UrWork_FearIsNotJustifiedInAnyForm.wma
or viahttp://www.youtube.com/sonshippress
Hey, Lee, how are you? Question: Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM? You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)
I thought Lee changed it into that. It's not like that in the blue books,
that were edited and published and the ones meant to be used. I prefer it,
that way (like in the blue books) it's more flowing and less choppy.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
What, huh, what? How could Lee change it to iambic pentameter? I
am trying to find out where the first instance of iambic pentameter is
found in ACIM. Why, you wonder. Because the iambic pentameter
sentences cannot be edited. Very important.

Looking it up, in the first edited/published edition (the one we were meant
to have, overall) it's not in I.P.
ACIM Workbook Lesson 244 ~ September 1
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson244.htm
http://www.acimradio.net/urwork/
" Lesson 244
"I am in danger nowhere in the world."
- "Your Son is safe wherever he may be,
for You are there with him. He need but call
<upon> Your Name, and he will recollect
his safety and Your Love, for they are one.
How can he fear or doubt or fail to know
he cannot suffer, be endangered, or
experience unhappiness, when he
belongs to You, beloved and loving, in
the safety of Your Fatherly embrace?"
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
---------------------------------------------

From the First edited/published edtion:

LESSON 244.

I am in danger nowhere in the world.Your Son is safe wherever he may be,
for You are there with

him. He need but call upon Your Name, and he will recollect his

safety and Your Love, for they are one. How can he fear or doubt or

fail to know he cannot suffer, be endangered, or experience

unhappiness, when he belongs to You, beloved and loving, in the

safety of Your Fatherly embrace?



If it was meant to be in "Iambic Pentimeter" wouldn't it have been
published that way?

And, as I said, why would it have to be labeled that way. Though I
suppose anyone reading it for the first time, it might be good to know it
isn't that choppy and hard to read in the bpoks that were given to the world
to learn from.

And, the point of it isn't to get hung up on the words and format.

Someone might get it 100% perfectly right, in format, but doesn't mean
they are teaching it in from a content of Love.
Deborah
2011-09-02 05:16:03 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:51:15 -0400, "Carrie"
Post by Mike
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson240.htmhttp...
" Lesson 240 October 16, 1970
"Fear is not justified in any form."
- Fear is deception. It attests that you
have seen yourself as you could never be,
and therefore look upon a world which is
impossible. Not one thing in [that] world
is true. It does not matter what the form
in which it may appear. It witnesses
but to your own illusions of yourself.
Let us not be deceived today. We are
the Son of God. There is no fear in us,
for we are each a part of Love Itself.
- "How foolish are our fears! Would You allow
Your Son to suffer? Give us faith today
to recognize Your Son and set him free.
Let us forgive him in Your Name, that we
may understand his holiness, and feel
the love for him that is Your own as well." "
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
------------------------------------------
[ Hear Today's Lesson in I.P. ~ Voice & Music by Maz ]
http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/240_UrWork_FearIsNotJustifiedInAnyForm.wma
or viahttp://www.youtube.com/sonshippress
Hey, Lee, how are you? Question: Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM? You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)
I thought Lee changed it into that. It's not like that in the blue books,
that were edited and published and the ones meant to be used. I prefer it,
that way (like in the blue books) it's more flowing and less choppy.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
What, huh, what? How could Lee change it to iambic pentameter? I
am trying to find out where the first instance of iambic pentameter is
found in ACIM. Why, you wonder. Because the iambic pentameter
sentences cannot be edited. Very important.
Looking it up, in the first edited/published edition (the one we were meant
to have, overall) it's not in I.P.
ACIM Workbook Lesson 244 ~ September 1
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson244.htm
http://www.acimradio.net/urwork/
" Lesson 244
"I am in danger nowhere in the world."
- "Your Son is safe wherever he may be,
for You are there with him. He need but call
<upon> Your Name, and he will recollect
his safety and Your Love, for they are one.
How can he fear or doubt or fail to know
he cannot suffer, be endangered, or
experience unhappiness, when he
belongs to You, beloved and loving, in
the safety of Your Fatherly embrace?"
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
---------------------------------------------
LESSON 244.
I am in danger nowhere in the world.Your Son is safe wherever he may be,
for You are there with
him. He need but call upon Your Name, and he will recollect his
safety and Your Love, for they are one. How can he fear or doubt or
fail to know he cannot suffer, be endangered, or experience
unhappiness, when he belongs to You, beloved and loving, in the
safety of Your Fatherly embrace?
If it was meant to be in "Iambic Pentimeter" wouldn't it have been
published that way?
It was. All Lee did was take the iambic pentameter and separate it
into lines, to highlight it.

Surely you have noticed the singsong quality much of the course? It's
there (when it is) because the course is in iambic pentameter.
Post by Mike
And, as I said, why would it have to be labeled that way. Though I
suppose anyone reading it for the first time, it might be good to know it
isn't that choppy and hard to read in the bpoks that were given to the world
to learn from.
And, the point of it isn't to get hung up on the words and format.
Someone might get it 100% perfectly right, in format, but doesn't mean
they are teaching it in from a content of Love.
Carrie
2011-09-02 13:53:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deborah
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:51:15 -0400, "Carrie"
Post by Mike
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson240.htmhttp...
" Lesson 240 October 16, 1970
"Fear is not justified in any form."
- Fear is deception. It attests that you
have seen yourself as you could never be,
and therefore look upon a world which is
impossible. Not one thing in [that] world
is true. It does not matter what the form
in which it may appear. It witnesses
but to your own illusions of yourself.
Let us not be deceived today. We are
the Son of God. There is no fear in us,
for we are each a part of Love Itself.
- "How foolish are our fears! Would You allow
Your Son to suffer? Give us faith today
to recognize Your Son and set him free.
Let us forgive him in Your Name, that we
may understand his holiness, and feel
the love for him that is Your own as well." "
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
------------------------------------------
[ Hear Today's Lesson in I.P. ~ Voice & Music by Maz ]
http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/240_UrWork_FearIsNotJustifiedInAnyForm.wma
or viahttp://www.youtube.com/sonshippress
Hey, Lee, how are you? Question: Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM? You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)
I thought Lee changed it into that. It's not like that in the blue books,
that were edited and published and the ones meant to be used. I prefer it,
that way (like in the blue books) it's more flowing and less choppy.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
What, huh, what? How could Lee change it to iambic pentameter? I
am trying to find out where the first instance of iambic pentameter is
found in ACIM. Why, you wonder. Because the iambic pentameter
sentences cannot be edited. Very important.
Looking it up, in the first edited/published edition (the one we were meant
to have, overall) it's not in I.P.
ACIM Workbook Lesson 244 ~ September 1
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson244.htm
http://www.acimradio.net/urwork/
" Lesson 244
"I am in danger nowhere in the world."
- "Your Son is safe wherever he may be,
for You are there with him. He need but call
<upon> Your Name, and he will recollect
his safety and Your Love, for they are one.
How can he fear or doubt or fail to know
he cannot suffer, be endangered, or
experience unhappiness, when he
belongs to You, beloved and loving, in
the safety of Your Fatherly embrace?"
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
---------------------------------------------
LESSON 244.
I am in danger nowhere in the world.Your Son is safe wherever he may be,
for You are there with
him. He need but call upon Your Name, and he will recollect his
safety and Your Love, for they are one. How can he fear or doubt or
fail to know he cannot suffer, be endangered, or experience
unhappiness, when he belongs to You, beloved and loving, in the
safety of Your Fatherly embrace?
If it was meant to be in "Iambic Pentimeter" wouldn't it have been
published that way?
It was. All Lee did was take the iambic pentameter and separate it
into lines, to highlight it.
Surely you have noticed the singsong quality much of the course? It's
there (when it is) because the course is in iambic pentameter.
Post by Mike
And, as I said, why would it have to be labeled that way. Though I
suppose anyone reading it for the first time, it might be good to know it
isn't that choppy and hard to read in the bpoks that were given to the world
to learn from.
And, the point of it isn't to get hung up on the words and format.
Someone might get it 100% perfectly right, in format, but doesn't mean
they are teaching it in from a content of Love.
I know, whatever anyone wants and feels right about. I think that getting
hung up on the format of it, and the original manuscript (while interesting
in a way) is kind of an ego mind distraction from what it "says". Of course,
noticing this is me doing the same thing. I remember when the JCIM and
Urtext, etc came out, I asked someone I know who doesn't write on course
discussion boards, who just has the first blue book, read it, and "lives it"
if she would like to read the files of the earlier manuscripts? She said no,
she had read the course and believe it, and puts it into her life as best
she can, and that's all she needs.
I'm always looking for something to have a "discussion" about, which
usually tends to come across like I want to argue, and who is right or
wrong, etc. I think before doing this I'm supposed to ask my Inner Teacher,
"what is the most peaceful and joining thing to say?"
If someone wants to make a big deal about the "format" of the course and
how it was originally written, compared to how it was set up in the
edited/published version, first given to the world, I don't have to give
attention to it. I like the more flowing way, letting the words sink in. The
"beat" of them doesn't come into it or, having to label it in a certain way.
Have you heard this? (Maz)
http://www.acimradio.net/
The lessons are all set to music (link on the side) I don't know if
every line is a beat of 10 or not, but it's beautiful, the words have
meaning and it flows.
Mike
2011-09-02 21:12:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deborah
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:51:15 -0400, "Carrie"
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson240.htmhttp...
" Lesson 240 October 16, 1970
"Fear is not justified in any form."
- Fear is deception. It attests that you
have seen yourself as you could never be,
and therefore look upon a world which is
impossible. Not one thing in [that] world
is true. It does not matter what the form
in which it may appear. It witnesses
but to your own illusions of yourself.
Let us not be deceived today. We are
the Son of God. There is no fear in us,
for we are each a part of Love Itself.
- "How foolish are our fears! Would You allow
Your Son to suffer? Give us faith today
to recognize Your Son and set him free.
Let us forgive him in Your Name, that we
may understand his holiness, and feel
the love for him that is Your own as well." "
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
------------------------------------------
[ Hear Today's Lesson in I.P. ~ Voice & Music by Maz ]
http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/240_UrWork_FearIsNotJustifiedInAnyForm.wma
or viahttp://www.youtube.com/sonshippress
Hey, Lee, how are you? Question: Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM? You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)
I thought Lee changed it into that. It's not like that in the blue books,
that were edited and published and the ones meant to be used. I prefer it,
that way (like in the blue books) it's more flowing and less choppy.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
 What, huh, what?  How could Lee change it to iambic pentameter?  I
am trying to find out where the first instance of iambic pentameter is
found in ACIM.  Why, you wonder.  Because the iambic pentameter
sentences cannot be edited.  Very important.
Looking it up, in the first edited/published edition (the one we were meant
to have, overall) it's not in I.P.
ACIM Workbook Lesson 244 ~ September 1
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson244.htm
http://www.acimradio.net/urwork/
" Lesson 244
  "I am in danger nowhere in the world."
- "Your Son is safe wherever he may be,
   for You are there with him. He need but call
   <upon> Your Name, and he will recollect
   his safety and Your Love, for they are one.
   How can he fear or doubt or fail to know
   he cannot suffer, be endangered, or
   experience unhappiness, when he
   belongs to You, beloved and loving, in
   the safety of Your Fatherly embrace?"
  ~ Original Handscript of ACIM
---------------------------------------------
LESSON 244.
I am in danger nowhere in the world.Your Son is safe wherever he may be,
for You are there with
him.  He need but call upon Your Name, and he will recollect his
safety and Your Love, for they are one.  How can he fear or doubt or
fail to know he cannot suffer, be endangered, or experience
unhappiness, when he belongs to You, beloved and loving, in the
safety of Your Fatherly embrace?
  If it was meant to be in "Iambic Pentimeter" wouldn't it have been
published that way?
It was.  All Lee did was take the iambic pentameter and separate it
into lines, to highlight it.
Surely you have noticed the singsong quality much of the course?  It's
there (when it is) because the course is in iambic pentameter.
  And, as I said, why would it have to be labeled that way. Though I
suppose anyone reading it for the first time, it might be good to know it
isn't that choppy and hard to read in the bpoks that were given to the world
to learn from.
  And, the point of it isn't to get hung up on the words and format.
   Someone might get it 100% perfectly right, in format, but doesn't mean
they are teaching it in from a content of Love.
  I know, whatever anyone wants and feels right about. I think that getting
hung up on the format of it, and the original manuscript (while interesting
in a way) is kind of an ego mind distraction from what it "says". Of course,
noticing this is me doing the same thing. I remember when the JCIM and
Urtext, etc came out, I asked someone I know who doesn't write on course
discussion boards, who just has the first blue book, read it, and "lives it"
if she would like to read the files of the earlier manuscripts? She said no,
she had read the course and believe it, and puts it into her life as best
she can, and that's all she needs.
  I'm always looking for something to have a "discussion" about, which
usually tends to come across like I want to argue, and who is right or
wrong, etc. I think before doing this I'm supposed to ask my Inner Teacher,
"what is the most peaceful and joining thing to say?"
   If someone wants to make a big deal about the "format" of the course and
how it was originally written, compared to how it was set up in the
edited/published version, first given to the world, I don't have to give
attention to it. I like the more flowing way, letting the words sink in. The
"beat" of them doesn't come into it or, having to label it in a certain way.
    Have you heard this? (Maz)
   http://www.acimradio.net/
    The lessons are all set to music (link on the side) I don't know if
every line is a beat of 10 or not, but it's beautiful, the words have
meaning and it flows.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Verse written in iambic pentameter has a very specific rhythm: five
feet per line with two beats per foot with the accent on the second
syllable of each foot. Therefor, ten beats per line, with the accent
on
the even numbered beats. This is the meter that Shakespeare wrote
verse in. It is important to ACIM, not merely because it is iambic
but because any changes made to a part of the text that was originally
written in iambic pentameter must also be written in iambic
pentameter.
It is not such an easy thing to do.
All, or nearly all, of the controversy surrounding the meaning of
ACIM
passages centers around the way passages have been edited. Therefor,
it follows that passages originally written in iambic pentameter have
not
been altered, edited or abbreviated and represent what was dictated by
Jesus. So, we can count upon the authenticity of these passages. In
other words Dr. Wapnick was not a good enough writer to edit
successfully
any and all passages written in this meter. Therefor, the iambic
passages
are trustworthy. And that is why iambic pentameter is important.
Okey dokey? Of course it is true that content trumps form, but if the
form dials in the content there can be no controversy. Oui?
Carrie
2011-09-02 23:54:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Carrie
Post by Deborah
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:51:15 -0400, "Carrie"
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson240.htmhttp...
" Lesson 240 October 16, 1970
"Fear is not justified in any form."
- Fear is deception. It attests that you
have seen yourself as you could never be,
and therefore look upon a world which is
impossible. Not one thing in [that] world
is true. It does not matter what the form
in which it may appear. It witnesses
but to your own illusions of yourself.
Let us not be deceived today. We are
the Son of God. There is no fear in us,
for we are each a part of Love Itself.
- "How foolish are our fears! Would You allow
Your Son to suffer? Give us faith today
to recognize Your Son and set him free.
Let us forgive him in Your Name, that we
may understand his holiness, and feel
the love for him that is Your own as well." "
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
------------------------------------------
[ Hear Today's Lesson in I.P. ~ Voice & Music by Maz ]
http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/240_UrWork_FearIsNotJustifiedInAnyForm.wma
or viahttp://www.youtube.com/sonshippress
Hey, Lee, how are you? Question: Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM? You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)
I thought Lee changed it into that. It's not like that in the blue books,
that were edited and published and the ones meant to be used. I prefer it,
that way (like in the blue books) it's more flowing and less choppy.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
What, huh, what? How could Lee change it to iambic pentameter? I
am trying to find out where the first instance of iambic pentameter is
found in ACIM. Why, you wonder. Because the iambic pentameter
sentences cannot be edited. Very important.
Looking it up, in the first edited/published edition (the one we were meant
to have, overall) it's not in I.P.
ACIM Workbook Lesson 244 ~ September 1
http://courseinmiracles.com/workbook_lessons/part_2/lesson244.htm
http://www.acimradio.net/urwork/
" Lesson 244
"I am in danger nowhere in the world."
- "Your Son is safe wherever he may be,
for You are there with him. He need but call
<upon> Your Name, and he will recollect
his safety and Your Love, for they are one.
How can he fear or doubt or fail to know
he cannot suffer, be endangered, or
experience unhappiness, when he
belongs to You, beloved and loving, in
the safety of Your Fatherly embrace?"
~ Original Handscript of ACIM
---------------------------------------------
LESSON 244.
I am in danger nowhere in the world.Your Son is safe wherever he may be,
for You are there with
him. He need but call upon Your Name, and he will recollect his
safety and Your Love, for they are one. How can he fear or doubt or
fail to know he cannot suffer, be endangered, or experience
unhappiness, when he belongs to You, beloved and loving, in the
safety of Your Fatherly embrace?
If it was meant to be in "Iambic Pentimeter" wouldn't it have been
published that way?
It was. All Lee did was take the iambic pentameter and separate it
into lines, to highlight it.
Surely you have noticed the singsong quality much of the course? It's
there (when it is) because the course is in iambic pentameter.
And, as I said, why would it have to be labeled that way. Though I
suppose anyone reading it for the first time, it might be good to know it
isn't that choppy and hard to read in the bpoks that were given to the world
to learn from.
And, the point of it isn't to get hung up on the words and format.
Someone might get it 100% perfectly right, in format, but doesn't mean
they are teaching it in from a content of Love.
I know, whatever anyone wants and feels right about. I think that getting
hung up on the format of it, and the original manuscript (while interesting
in a way) is kind of an ego mind distraction from what it "says". Of course,
noticing this is me doing the same thing. I remember when the JCIM and
Urtext, etc came out, I asked someone I know who doesn't write on course
discussion boards, who just has the first blue book, read it, and "lives it"
if she would like to read the files of the earlier manuscripts? She said no,
she had read the course and believe it, and puts it into her life as best
she can, and that's all she needs.
I'm always looking for something to have a "discussion" about, which
usually tends to come across like I want to argue, and who is right or
wrong, etc. I think before doing this I'm supposed to ask my Inner Teacher,
"what is the most peaceful and joining thing to say?"
If someone wants to make a big deal about the "format" of the course and
how it was originally written, compared to how it was set up in the
edited/published version, first given to the world, I don't have to give
attention to it. I like the more flowing way, letting the words sink in. The
"beat" of them doesn't come into it or, having to label it in a certain way.
Have you heard this? (Maz)
http://www.acimradio.net/
The lessons are all set to music (link on the side) I don't know if
every line is a beat of 10 or not, but it's beautiful, the words have
meaning and it flows.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Verse written in iambic pentameter has a very specific rhythm: five
feet per line with two beats per foot with the accent on the second
syllable of each foot. Therefor, ten beats per line, with the accent
on
the even numbered beats. This is the meter that Shakespeare wrote
verse in. It is important to ACIM, not merely because it is iambic
but because any changes made to a part of the text that was originally
written in iambic pentameter must also be written in iambic
pentameter.
It is not such an easy thing to do.
All, or nearly all, of the controversy surrounding the meaning of
ACIM
passages centers around the way passages have been edited. Therefor,
it follows that passages originally written in iambic pentameter have
not
been altered, edited or abbreviated and represent what was dictated by
Jesus. So, we can count upon the authenticity of these passages. In
other words Dr. Wapnick was not a good enough writer to edit
successfully
any and all passages written in this meter. Therefor, the iambic
passages
are trustworthy. And that is why iambic pentameter is important.
Okey dokey? Of course it is true that content trumps form, but if the
form dials in the content there can be no controversy. Oui?

It's not important to me. Words are form, twice removed.
Well, I guess it has been important to me in an ego way, I never see the
need to announce the lessons are now set up in "iambic pentameter". I guess
it feels like it's putting emphasis on the form and beat or whatever.
And I believe Ken Wapnick and those who edited it to be published (Helen
was part of this, probably Bill, I've only read about it) we Guided in what
they did. The way it was then giving to the world, overall to learn.
Of course, maybe Lee was Guided to put it back the way it started out,
and some feel it should be.
To me, the JCIM and Urtext are interesting, but they really weren't
meant for all. The original course was given to Bill and Helen, in a
personal way. It was then edited in a more overall way, for everyone else.
I just don't like the emphasis on the "beat" and changing the flow of
it. It seem to get in the way of the "content". Also the idea of the need
for "correction" of it, when it was given to the world, in a perfect way.
But, to each his own, I guess.
No one says I have to pay attention to it. I also think it's inevitable
that the longer it's in the ego world of illusion, the more it's going to be
changed and brought off in all directions.
If you like it with the lessons choppy and the lines cut off in
sometimes odd ways, than it's perfect for you.
I have more then enough files and audio files and tapes of it, and by
now I should really know it by heart, at least the main point(s) of it.
Pieter
2011-09-03 15:59:53 UTC
Permalink
To me, the JCIM and Urtext are interesting, but they really weren't meant
for all. The original course was given to Bill and Helen, in a personal
way. It was then edited in a more overall way, for everyone else.
- I can follow you in this.
I just don't like the emphasis on the "beat" and changing the flow of
it.
- The flow is not changed.
Just the reverse: it is brought to light!
It seem to get in the way of the "content". Also the idea of the need for
"correction" of it, when it was given to the world, in a perfect way.
To me this has nothing to do with 'correction'.
It is merely that the already existing rhythm
is brought to light.
BTW For me, not being a native English speaker,
the iambic pentameter does help me learn
how to pronounce the words. Without it I'm
not yet sure always where the accents are.
Mike
2011-09-03 16:38:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pieter
To me, the JCIM and Urtext are interesting, but they really weren't meant
for all. The original course was given to Bill and Helen, in a personal
way. It was then edited in a more overall way, for everyone else.
- I can follow you in this.
    I just don't like the emphasis on the "beat" and changing the flow of
it.
- The flow is not changed.
Just the reverse: it is brought to light!
It seem to get in the way of the "content". Also the idea of the need for
"correction" of it, when it was given to the world, in a perfect way.
To me this has nothing to do with 'correction'.
It is merely that the already existing rhythm
is brought to light.
BTW For me, not being a native English speaker,
the iambic pentameter does help me learn
how to pronounce the words. Without it I'm
not yet sure always where the accents are.
Carrie and Pieter,
Lee's response answers all the questions about the whys and
wherefors of the use of iambic pentameter in the course. Good to see
both of you are still here.
Carrie
2011-09-03 17:32:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pieter
To me, the JCIM and Urtext are interesting, but they really weren't meant
for all. The original course was given to Bill and Helen, in a personal
way. It was then edited in a more overall way, for everyone else.
- I can follow you in this.
I just don't like the emphasis on the "beat" and changing the flow of
it.
- The flow is not changed.
Just the reverse: it is brought to light!
It seem to get in the way of the "content". Also the idea of the need for
"correction" of it, when it was given to the world, in a perfect way.
To me this has nothing to do with 'correction'.
It is merely that the already existing rhythm
is brought to light.
BTW For me, not being a native English speaker,
the iambic pentameter does help me learn
how to pronounce the words. Without it I'm
not yet sure always where the accents are.
Carrie and Pieter,
Lee's response answers all the questions about the whys and
wherefors of the use of iambic pentameter in the course. Good to see
both of you are still here.

I just think it really doesn't matter. The course can be taught in no
words or words (for those unable yet to hear in silence), etc... Though of
course that also applies to it not mattering to me.
I'm always looking for discussion LOL
Carrie
2011-09-03 17:28:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pieter
To me, the JCIM and Urtext are interesting, but they really weren't meant
for all. The original course was given to Bill and Helen, in a personal
way. It was then edited in a more overall way, for everyone else.
- I can follow you in this.
I just don't like the emphasis on the "beat" and changing the flow of
it.
- The flow is not changed.
Just the reverse: it is brought to light!
It seem to get in the way of the "content". Also the idea of the need for
"correction" of it, when it was given to the world, in a perfect way.
To me this has nothing to do with 'correction'.
It is merely that the already existing rhythm
is brought to light.
BTW For me, not being a native English speaker,
the iambic pentameter does help me learn
how to pronounce the words. Without it I'm
not yet sure always where the accents are.
Well that's good. To me, it seems too choppy and cut up like stops and
goes to another line, sometimes in the middle of the previous one. It
doesn't seem to flow. But, we have choices. It's probably my imagination but
seems like setting it up as iambic pentameter and having to label it as that
gets in the way of the meaning of the words.
Lee Flynn
2011-09-03 15:48:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
....
Hey, Lee, how are you?
Hi there Mike. I've been very well, how about yourself?
Post by Mike
Question: Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM? You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)
Something like 15 years ago, Michael (Steve) Russell wrote a study of
the iambic pentameter in the Course, entitled "The Rhythm and Reason
of Reality". This is from his introduction to that book. I think it will
answer most of your questions about where the iambic pentameter
makes its appearance across the Text and Workbook. ~ Lee
_________


"This course has come from him because his words
have reached you in a language you can love
and understand." (Manual For Teachers)

Introduction

You may remember reading, amongst the literature concerning the scribing
of A Course In Miracles, references to the use of the poetic form called
iambic pentameter. Most of you won't know exactly what this means, and
of those who do, most will not be able to easily discern the poetic form
within the prosaic layout of the Course.

The purpose of this volume is to present the poetry of the Course in a
totally accessible manner. You need know nothing about poetic forms and
meters to begin enjoying it immediately. You may, however, wish to read
this introduction, since the search to ascertain the extent of the poetic
form within the Course has revealed another astounding dimension in its
structural integrity.

Definitions: Iambic pentameter is usually described as "lines consisting
of five iambs", which in turn are described as "metric feet of two
syllables each, the second syllable being the stronger". Such a
description is useful to few. Put simply, a line of iambic pentameter
feels like this:

Da-dum da-dum da-dum da-dum da-dum.

(This form is also called "blank verse", a more general term denoting
even rhythm without rhyming.)

Because the Course is published entirely as prose, the extent to which
iambic pentameter is used is a surprising and exciting discovery. It
divides the Text of A Course In Miracles into three distinct parts, two
of twelve chapters each, and the last of seven chapters. Within this
structure, a gradual transition is made from prose to iambic pentameter.

Normal spoken English and prose is arhythmic, having sometimes one,
sometimes two syllables between accents, with no discernable pattern.
The first twelve chapters of the Course are written in such prose, and
the portrait of the human condition given is prosaic indeed. The very
last sentence of the section is the first instance (that this reader
found) of the poetic form: "Your Father could not cease to love His Son."

The second part, Chapters 13 to 24, is mostly iambic but not
pentametric - there is one syllable between accents, but the pairs of
unaccented and accented syllables are not arranged in groups of five.
This iambic characteristic is phased in over the first six sections of
Chapter 13. In section seven, "The Attainment of the Real World," each
paragraph contains on average only three or four irregularities. However
the second part of the Course is not without any instance of iambic
pentameter. Frequently, paragraphs begin with emphatic statements given
in iambic pentameter. "There is a light that this world cannot give;" is
the first such occurrence. "You do not really want the world you see;"
"We cannot sing redemption's hymn alone;" "Your faith in nothing is
deceiving you." These powerful statements are each elucidated
conceptually in the paragraphs that follow from them, however the
receptive mind may find further reading unnecessary or even quite
impossible for some time. A collection of these opening sentences is
given at the end of this introduction, containing every instance that
this reader could identify.

Deeper into the second part, increasingly strong "insertions" of iambic
pentameter occur - longer passages that persist further into the
paragraphs. For instance, in Chapter 21:

Thus they define their life and where they live,
adjusting to it as they think they must,
afraid to lose the little that they have.
And so it is with all who see the body
as all they have and all their brothers have.
They try to reach each other, and they fail,
and fail again.

Coincident with the approach of total iambic pentameter, Jesus makes this
statement (in Chapter 22): "This is a crucial period in this course, for
here the separation of you and the ego must be made complete." And this:

This course will be believed entirely
or not at all.
For it is wholly true or wholly false,
and cannot be but partially believed.

Chapter 25 is the beginning of the final part. In Chapters 25 and 26 the
final transition is made into seamless iambic pentameter, making feasible
its presentation as poetry in the same manner as the works of Shakespeare
are presented, with two columns of the short blank verse lines to a page.
It is at this last part that this volume takes up the Text.

Some parts of these two chapters are still not regular enough to allow
breakdown into lines, and so are presented as prose. Also, the regular
iambic pentameter in these two chapters, and early in Chapter 27, often
contains lines that have one extra syllable, or short lines of only four
or six syllables. I make no claim to correct division of lines in these
circumstances, although in most instances the short line quite obviously
emphasizes a point.

In the remaining chapters of the Text, the iambic pentameter is perfect.
Jesus never abbreviates words to achieve this, but does make use of words
with an adaptable syllable count: Heaven as one or two syllables, idea as
two or three. Occasional occurrences of one extra syllable at the end of
a line fall within the accepted parameters of the form. Maintenance of
the meter accounts for what frequently seemed to be unusual syntax when
read as prose - but which now makes perfect sense as poetry.

A transition from prose to poetry also occurs in the Workbook, but it is
much simpler, and quicker. The first ninety lessons are plain prose,
with the exception of Lesson 78, which is totally poetic. The transition
occurs entirely within seven lessons. Lesson 91 is prose. The following
lessons have increasing percentages of verse, but the distinction is kept
very clear. Each paragraph is either entirely prose, or entirely poetry,
and within the poetry there are very few uneven or short lines. Lesson
98 is pure poetry, and it is astonishing to discover that everything in
the Workbook from Lesson 98 on is in iambic pentameter ~ the
introductions to Reviews and the Reviews themselves, the "instructions on
themes of special relevance," (such as What is Forgiveness?) the prayers
and the Epilogue.

The Manual for Teachers and Clarification of Terms often refer to Jesus
in the third person, possibly indicating different or collaborative
authorship. They contain very few but very beautiful poetic passages,
and these are also included here, as is a collection of iambic pentameter
"zingers" from within the second section of the text.

Attempts to read the poetic form directly from the original prose layout
often result in diminished comprehension - one is so busy holding on to
the form that the meaning is lost. Conversely, the presentation as
blank verse guarantees placing correct emphasis for understanding (though
not understanding itself,) and the elegance and eloquence of Jesus'
poetry, and the regular rhythmic lope, offer an expanded experience of
the Course to the musical mind.

The magnitude and beauty of the Course, simply as a work of literature
and without regard to its miraculous content, adequately belie any notion
of its human authorship. To those who wonder why Jesus chose to use this
form, I can only say that it is clear from the content of A Course In
Miracles that healing is its only purpose, and so this poetry must also
serve that purpose.


~ Steve Russell
Mike
2011-09-03 16:43:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lee Flynn
Post by Mike
Post by Lee Flynn
ACIM Workbook Lesson 240 ~ August 28
....
Hey, Lee, how are you?
Hi there Mike. I've been very well, how about yourself?
Post by Mike
Question:  Where is the first occasion of
iambic pentameter found in ACIM?  You have posted it before, but I
forget. :)
Something like 15 years ago, Michael (Steve) Russell wrote a study of
the iambic pentameter in the Course, entitled  "The Rhythm and Reason
of Reality". This is from his introduction to that book. I think it will
answer most of your questions about where the iambic pentameter
makes its appearance across the Text and Workbook.  ~ Lee
_________
"This course has come from him because his words
have reached you in a language you can love
and understand."  (Manual For Teachers)
Introduction
You may remember reading, amongst the literature concerning the scribing
of A Course In Miracles, references to the use of the poetic form called
iambic pentameter.  Most of you won't know exactly what this means, and
of those who do, most will not be able to easily discern the poetic form
within the prosaic layout of the Course.
The purpose of this volume is to present the poetry of the Course in a
totally accessible manner.  You need know nothing about poetic forms and
meters to begin enjoying it immediately.  You may, however, wish to read
this introduction, since the search to ascertain the extent of the poetic
form within the Course has revealed another astounding dimension in its
structural integrity.
Definitions: Iambic pentameter is usually described as "lines consisting
of five iambs", which in turn are described as "metric feet of two
syllables each, the second syllable being the stronger".  Such a
description is useful to few.  Put simply, a line of iambic pentameter
                   Da-dum  da-dum  da-dum  da-dum  da-dum.
(This form is also called "blank verse", a more general term denoting
even rhythm without rhyming.)
Because the Course is published entirely as prose, the extent to which
iambic pentameter is used is a surprising and exciting discovery.  It
divides the Text of A Course In Miracles into three distinct parts, two
of twelve chapters each, and the last of seven chapters.  Within this
structure, a gradual transition is made from prose to iambic pentameter.
Normal spoken English and prose is arhythmic, having sometimes one,
sometimes two syllables between accents, with no discernable pattern.
The first twelve chapters of the Course are written in such prose, and
the portrait of the human condition given is prosaic indeed.  The very
last sentence of the section is the first instance (that this reader
found) of the poetic form: "Your Father could not cease to love His Son."
The second part, Chapters 13 to 24, is mostly iambic but not
pentametric - there is one syllable between accents, but the pairs of
unaccented and accented syllables are not arranged in groups of five.
This iambic characteristic is phased in over the first six sections of
Chapter 13.  In section seven, "The Attainment of the Real World," each
paragraph contains on average only three or four irregularities.  However
the second part of the Course is not without any instance of iambic
pentameter.  Frequently, paragraphs begin with emphatic statements given
in iambic pentameter.  "There is a light that this world cannot give;" is
the first such occurrence.  "You do not really want the world you see;"
"We cannot sing redemption's hymn alone;" "Your faith in nothing is
deceiving you."  These powerful statements are each elucidated
conceptually in the paragraphs that follow from them, however the
receptive mind may find further reading unnecessary or even quite
impossible for some time.  A collection of these opening sentences is
given at the end of this introduction, containing every instance that
this reader could identify.
Deeper into the second part, increasingly strong "insertions" of iambic
pentameter occur - longer passages that persist further into the
          Thus they define their life and where they live,
          adjusting to it as they think they must,
          afraid to lose the little that they have.
          And so it is with all who see the body
          as all they have and all their brothers have.
          They try to reach each other, and they fail,
          and fail again.
Coincident with the approach of total iambic pentameter, Jesus makes this
statement (in Chapter 22): "This is a crucial period in this course, for
          This course will be believed entirely
                                           or not at all.
          For it is wholly true or wholly false,
          and cannot be but partially believed.
Chapter 25 is the beginning of the final part.  In Chapters 25 and 26 the
final transition is made into seamless iambic pentameter, making feasible
its presentation as poetry in the same manner as the works of Shakespeare
are presented, with two columns of the short blank verse lines to a page.
It is at this last part that this volume takes up the Text.
Some parts of these two chapters are still not regular enough to allow
breakdown into lines, and so are presented as prose.  Also, the regular
iambic pentameter in these two chapters, and early in Chapter 27, often
contains lines that have one extra syllable, or short lines of only four
or six syllables.  I make no claim to correct division of lines in these
circumstances, although in most instances the short line quite obviously
emphasizes a point.
In the remaining chapters of the Text, the iambic pentameter is perfect.
Jesus never abbreviates words to achieve this, but does make use of words
with an adaptable syllable count: Heaven as one or two syllables, idea as
two or three.  Occasional occurrences of one extra syllable at the end of
a line fall within the accepted parameters of the form.  Maintenance of
the meter accounts for what frequently seemed to be unusual syntax when
read as prose - but which now makes perfect sense as poetry.
A transition from prose to poetry also occurs in the Workbook, but it is
much simpler, and quicker.  The first ninety lessons are plain prose,
with the exception of Lesson 78, which is totally poetic.  The transition
occurs entirely within seven lessons.  Lesson 91 is prose.  The following
lessons have increasing percentages of verse, but the distinction is kept
very clear.  Each paragraph is either entirely prose, or entirely poetry,
and within the poetry there are very few uneven or short lines.  Lesson
98 is pure poetry, and it is astonishing to discover that everything in
the Workbook from Lesson 98 on is in iambic pentameter ~ the
introductions to Reviews and the Reviews themselves, the "instructions on
themes of special relevance," (such as What is Forgiveness?) the prayers
and the Epilogue.
The Manual for Teachers and Clarification of Terms often refer to Jesus
in the third person, possibly indicating different or collaborative
authorship.  They contain very few but very beautiful poetic passages,
and these are also included here, as is a collection of iambic pentameter
"zingers" from within the second section of the text.
Attempts to read the poetic form directly from the original prose layout
often result in diminished comprehension - one is so busy holding on to
the form that the meaning is lost.   Conversely, the presentation as
blank verse guarantees placing correct emphasis for understanding (though
not understanding itself,) and the elegance and eloquence of Jesus'
poetry, and the regular rhythmic lope, offer an expanded experience of
the Course to the musical mind.
The magnitude and beauty of the Course, simply as a work of literature
and without regard to its miraculous content, adequately belie any notion
of its human authorship.  To those who wonder why Jesus chose to use this
form, I can only say that it is clear from the content of A Course In
Miracles that healing is its only purpose, and so this poetry must also
serve that purpose.
~ Steve Russell
Thanks for the answer, Lee. Enlightening. Don't really know
anything about Steve Russell, but he performed a fine service for one
and all.

I have always thought that the use of iambic pentameter carries the
weight of authenticity of the content. Therefor, where content within
in the course, for whatever reason, seems in conflict with itself, the
content written in iambic pentameter carries the most weight.

As for myself, I am somewhere between really good and peachy
keen.
Deborah
2011-09-03 20:26:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lee Flynn
Something like 15 years ago, Michael (Steve) Russell wrote a study of
the iambic pentameter in the Course, entitled "The Rhythm and Reason
of Reality".
He did not have access to the handscript, though. I am wondering what
your findings are as to the poetry in the "unedited" version.
Lee
2011-09-03 23:46:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deborah
Post by Lee Flynn
Something like 15 years ago, Michael (Steve) Russell wrote a study of
the iambic pentameter in the Course, entitled "The Rhythm and Reason
of Reality".
He did not have access to the handscript, though. I am wondering what
your findings are as to the poetry in the "unedited" version.
Hi Deborah,

The handscript of all the lessons, intros and special themes that appear
after Lesson 100 are written in her steno pad as 10-syllable-per-line
*stanzas of poetry* -- just as they appear in this online restoral of the
original dictation.

In posting these lessons, I'm putting brackets [ ] around all the words
that are different in the 2nd ed FIP blue book than what was originally
written in the handscript Notes. The idea is to provide a handy reference
(FIP) by which those interested may compare the original words to
the later variants.

As for the i.p. that appeared in the last chapters of the Text, Helen
definitely began putting tick marks after every 10 syllables (five
"iambs") as she was scribing the material, but she was not prompted
to frame it on her steno pages in its strict stanza form until much later,
midway into Lesson 100.

You can see the handscript pages for today's Lesson 247, for instance,
at this url: (takes a few minutes to load)

http://www.miraclesinactionpress.com/dthomp74/2008/TOOLBOX/1a%20NOTES%20facsimile/2%201a%20Workbook%20NOTES%20v2.pdf
(or http://tinyurl.com/4yjsxq5)

From the pdf's options at left sidebar, select Pages, then pg 414.

It's impressive for many to see that the poetry just spilled off her
pen, with the barest minimum of corrections, compositional edits
or corrections.

~ Lee
Deborah
2011-09-05 06:20:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lee
Post by Deborah
Post by Lee Flynn
Something like 15 years ago, Michael (Steve) Russell wrote a study of
the iambic pentameter in the Course, entitled "The Rhythm and Reason
of Reality".
He did not have access to the handscript, though. I am wondering what
your findings are as to the poetry in the "unedited" version.
Hi Deborah,
The handscript of all the lessons, intros and special themes that appear
after Lesson 100 are written in her steno pad as 10-syllable-per-line
*stanzas of poetry* -- just as they appear in this online restoral of the
original dictation.
In posting these lessons, I'm putting brackets [ ] around all the words
that are different in the 2nd ed FIP blue book than what was originally
written in the handscript Notes. The idea is to provide a handy reference
(FIP) by which those interested may compare the original words to
the later variants.
As for the i.p. that appeared in the last chapters of the Text, Helen
definitely began putting tick marks after every 10 syllables (five
"iambs") as she was scribing the material, but she was not prompted
to frame it on her steno pages in its strict stanza form until much later,
midway into Lesson 100.
You can see the handscript pages for today's Lesson 247, for instance,
at this url: (takes a few minutes to load)
http://www.miraclesinactionpress.com/dthomp74/2008/TOOLBOX/1a%20NOTES%20facsimile/2%201a%20Workbook%20NOTES%20v2.pdf
(or http://tinyurl.com/4yjsxq5)
From the pdf's options at left sidebar, select Pages, then pg 414.
It's impressive for many to see that the poetry just spilled off her
pen, with the barest minimum of corrections, compositional edits
or corrections.
~ Lee
I am not sure exactly what her talent was, as a scribe, but I think
"Because you'll do it" isn't the whole explanation for why Helen was
suited to the task. The more completely she joined with the endeavor,
the better it was. Her full collaboration was necessary.

For me that idea doesn't taint the course in the least. Ultimately
what the author is selling was more than she could buy - more than I
can buy, too. I can not get past what I see as failings, in others.
Not that I don't have plenty of failings myself, but it is easier for
me to think we are all flawed than it is for me to think we are all
perfect, sinless children of God.

Of course, I'm not expected to do it on my own...

Thanks for all the work you have done, on this, Lee - and everyone
else involved. It would probably just stun guys like Tom, over at
alt.magick, that there is actually such a thing as course scholarship,
people who fought for the right to examine the original documents and
who have conducted detailed comparative examinations. Stunned too by
the average intelligence and/or education level of so many of its
students.

I just don't know if what it has all demonstrated is what was
originally *said*, or what was originally *heard*. (There is a
difference). Nor do I know if ACIM was ever intended to be taken as a
document that warranted something like "Biblical scholarship". It is
interesting to me that all three of its principal collaborators were
psychologists, interesting too the juxtaposition of Freud and Jung as
contemporaries, one of whom purportedly had the whole explanation for
the human psyche, while the other was somewhat appalled at the extent
to which humanity was willing to embraced its humanity through
psychology,and forget its divinity. Into that world the course came.
This, it seems to me, is what the course came to correct. Not the
teachings of mainstream Christianity that had been allowed to fester,
unchecked, for more than 1500 years...

Our world. Our modern world, where there's a pill for every possible
condition of the human brain because we think that's what controls us.

It's just another excuse.

Loading...