Discussion:
Ping Carrie
(too old to reply)
Sidney Lambe
2010-12-27 14:10:38 UTC
Permalink
I meant to say this in a reply to the relevant post from you, but
got distracted and then lost track of it.

I like your articles. Your writing style. Even if I don't quote or
reply to the entirety, I read it.

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
John Radgosky
2010-12-27 16:44:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
I like your articles. Your writing style. Even if I don't quote or
reply to the entirety, I read it.
Sid
How very revealing.

On Dec 26th at approx 9:20pm Sid wrote,:
"Okay, Carrie. I am getting tired of you repeating this garbage."

Uh ... 12 hours between them.

So , what does the objective observer conclude from these 2 ,
apparantly conflicting statements from
one person to another?.

Is it possible our Sid suffers from "dual or split-personality" ?
Probably not.

Or can it be our Sid is affected by some form of substance abuse which
results in
some kind of "Jeckyl-Hyde" symptoms ? Who knows. But probably not.

Or, can it be our Sid lacks a consistent thought process? Doubtful.
There is
an abundance of consistent inconsistency so that's a blind alley.

To me it looks like there is something simple to conclude.

On the one hand, Sid likes the writing style of another. Fair
enough. That's good of him
to acknowledge and to communicate to the other.

But at the same time the CONTENT of that writing is according to Sid,
"garbage". Ouch.
A nasty critique, wouldn't you say ?

And there you have it.

I don't know how anyone else might wish it to be for them, but for me
I would much rather
another find my content of some value with no concern at all for the
style by which it was
presented. Having both style AND content appreciated is ideal of
course, but one can
always disregard or ignore style as long as content has appeal
value.

But all of this i's just my personal opinion. And one I felt like
sharing.

Isn't it wonderful to just .. you know ... share ?

JR
Carrie
2010-12-27 17:53:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Radgosky
Post by Sidney Lambe
I like your articles. Your writing style. Even if I don't quote or
reply to the entirety, I read it.
Sid
How very revealing.
"Okay, Carrie. I am getting tired of you repeating this garbage."
Uh ... 12 hours between them.
So , what does the objective observer conclude from these 2 ,
apparantly conflicting statements from
one person to another?.
Is it possible our Sid suffers from "dual or split-personality" ?
Probably not.
Or can it be our Sid is affected by some form of substance abuse which
results in
some kind of "Jeckyl-Hyde" symptoms ? Who knows. But probably not.
Or, can it be our Sid lacks a consistent thought process? Doubtful.
There is
an abundance of consistent inconsistency so that's a blind alley.
To me it looks like there is something simple to conclude.
On the one hand, Sid likes the writing style of another. Fair
enough. That's good of him
to acknowledge and to communicate to the other.
But at the same time the CONTENT of that writing is according to Sid,
"garbage". Ouch.
A nasty critique, wouldn't you say ?
And there you have it.
I don't know how anyone else might wish it to be for them, but for me
I would much rather
another find my content of some value with no concern at all for the
style by which it was
presented. Having both style AND content appreciated is ideal of
course, but one can
always disregard or ignore style as long as content has appeal
value.
But all of this i's just my personal opinion. And one I felt like
sharing.
Isn't it wonderful to just .. you know ... share ?
JR
I would rather discuss topics (ACIM or anything) and share about that, and
not get into personal opinions about the people writing them (or someone
else's judgement/ opinion about them) But, we can't control how anyone else
is, or seems to be. We can learn from it, even if that's just to accept it,
and make the peaceful choice not to tie in with it. If someone has already
decided I am a certain way, they are probably always going to see me that
way, no matter what I do, or try to do to change it. As Sid has pointed out
to you, you can take it or leave it.
John Radgosky
2010-12-27 20:56:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Radgosky
Post by Sidney Lambe
I like your articles. Your writing style. Even if I don't quote or
reply to the entirety, I read it.
Sid
How very revealing.
"Okay, Carrie. I am getting tired of you repeating this garbage."
Uh ... 12 hours between them.
So , what does the objective observer conclude from these 2 ,
apparantly conflicting statements from
one person to another?.
Is it possible our Sid suffers from "dual or split-personality" ?
Probably not.
Or can it be our Sid is affected by some form of substance abuse which
results in
some kind of "Jeckyl-Hyde" symptoms ?  Who knows.  But probably not.
Or, can it be our Sid lacks a consistent thought process?  Doubtful.
There is
an abundance of consistent inconsistency so that's a blind alley.
To me it looks like there is something simple to conclude.
On the one hand, Sid likes the writing style of another.  Fair
enough.  That's good of him
to acknowledge and to communicate to the other.
But at the same time the CONTENT of that writing is according to Sid,
"garbage".  Ouch.
A nasty critique, wouldn't you say ?
And there you have it.
I don't know how anyone else might wish it to be for them, but for me
I would much rather
another find my content of some value with no concern at all for the
style by which it was
presented.  Having both style AND content appreciated is ideal of
course, but one can
always disregard or ignore style as long as content has appeal
value.
But all of this i's just my personal opinion.  And one I felt like
sharing.
Isn't it wonderful to just .. you know ... share ?
JR
 I would rather discuss topics (ACIM or anything) and share about that,  
So why don't you then ?

and
not get into personal opinions about the people writing them (or someone
else's judgement/ opinion about them)
Uh ? Opinion ? I quoted. Specifically. Then, objectively
analyzed. Content vs style.
Where is the opinion in any of that ?

So who's now delving into personal opinions? You about my post which
you just commented about ?
Can you be MORE hypocritical ? I doubt it.
But, we can't control how anyone else
is, or seems to be. We can learn from it, even if that's just to accept it,
If one lives with such an attitude, "just to accept it", one NEVER
needs to
learn anything ever again. If it is learned, it doesn't have to be
relearned with
every new experience, does it ? Unless one is completely stupid and
doesn't
know how to retain what has been ... uh ... "learned".
and make the peaceful choice not to tie in with it. If someone has already
decided I am a certain way, they are probably always going to see me that
way, no matter what I do, or try to do to change it.
Why are you turning this into any discussion about " you " ? There ya
go again.
 As Sid has pointed out
to you, you can take it or leave it.-
Sid is ignorant by suggesting only limited choices.

He hasn;t pointed out other options. And so I chose one all by
myself.
So now the question has to be asked, why do you care, and why did you
feel you had to comment about it? Why didn't you just ... let it be
without
getting into it ? Why can't you take your own advice ?

reason is, your advice stinks and isn't worth following. If it were,
it would
be followed.

So now .... go to ACIM and see what IT has to say about this recent
post of yours.

Think about it.

JR
Carrie
2010-12-28 00:14:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Radgosky
Post by Carrie
Post by John Radgosky
Post by Sidney Lambe
I like your articles. Your writing style. Even if I don't quote or
reply to the entirety, I read it.
Sid
How very revealing.
"Okay, Carrie. I am getting tired of you repeating this garbage."
Uh ... 12 hours between them.
So , what does the objective observer conclude from these 2 ,
apparantly conflicting statements from
one person to another?.
Is it possible our Sid suffers from "dual or split-personality" ?
Probably not.
Or can it be our Sid is affected by some form of substance abuse
which results in
some kind of "Jeckyl-Hyde" symptoms ? Who knows. But probably not.
Or, can it be our Sid lacks a consistent thought process? Doubtful.
There is
an abundance of consistent inconsistency so that's a blind alley.
To me it looks like there is something simple to conclude.
On the one hand, Sid likes the writing style of another. Fair
enough. That's good of him
to acknowledge and to communicate to the other.
But at the same time the CONTENT of that writing is according to
Sid, "garbage". Ouch.
A nasty critique, wouldn't you say ?
And there you have it.
I don't know how anyone else might wish it to be for them, but for
me I would much rather
another find my content of some value with no concern at all for the
style by which it was
presented. Having both style AND content appreciated is ideal of
course, but one can
always disregard or ignore style as long as content has appeal
value.
But all of this i's just my personal opinion. And one I felt like
sharing.
Isn't it wonderful to just .. you know ... share ?
JR
I would rather discuss topics (ACIM or anything) and share about
that,
So why don't you then ?
and
Post by Carrie
not get into personal opinions about the people writing them (or
someone else's judgement/ opinion about them)
Uh ? Opinion ? I quoted. Specifically. Then, objectively
analyzed. Content vs style.
Where is the opinion in any of that ?
So who's now delving into personal opinions? You about my post which
you just commented about ?
Can you be MORE hypocritical ? I doubt it.
Post by Carrie
But, we can't control how anyone else
is, or seems to be. We can learn from it, even if that's just to accept it,
If one lives with such an attitude, "just to accept it", one NEVER
needs to
learn anything ever again. If it is learned, it doesn't have to be
relearned with
every new experience, does it ? Unless one is completely stupid and
doesn't
know how to retain what has been ... uh ... "learned".
Post by Carrie
and make the peaceful choice not to tie in with it. If someone has
already decided I am a certain way, they are probably always going
to see me that way, no matter what I do, or try to do to change it.
Why are you turning this into any discussion about " you " ? There ya
go again.
Post by Carrie
As Sid has pointed out
to you, you can take it or leave it.-
Sid is ignorant by suggesting only limited choices.
He hasn;t pointed out other options. And so I chose one all by
myself.
So now the question has to be asked, why do you care, and why did you
feel you had to comment about it? Why didn't you just ... let it be
without
getting into it ? Why can't you take your own advice ?
reason is, your advice stinks and isn't worth following. If it were,
it would
be followed.
So now .... go to ACIM and see what IT has to say about this recent
post of yours.
Think about it.
JR
Okay, I will take my own advice and not write to you anymore after this.
Since you can't seem to see me in any way but the way you have been telling
me. That will just leave Sid here for you to write to, and you don't seem to
like him, either. I guess you can always write to yourself. Then if you
don't like what you read, you will know where to look to change it LOL
John Radgosky
2010-12-28 05:52:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Radgosky
Post by Carrie
Post by John Radgosky
Post by Sidney Lambe
I like your articles. Your writing style. Even if I don't quote or
reply to the entirety, I read it.
Sid
How very revealing.
"Okay, Carrie. I am getting tired of you repeating this garbage."
Uh ... 12 hours between them.
So , what does the objective observer conclude from these 2 ,
apparantly conflicting statements from
one person to another?.
Is it possible our Sid suffers from "dual or split-personality" ?
Probably not.
Or can it be our Sid is affected by some form of substance abuse
which results in
some kind of "Jeckyl-Hyde" symptoms ? Who knows. But probably not.
Or, can it be our Sid lacks a consistent thought process? Doubtful.
There is
an abundance of consistent inconsistency so that's a blind alley.
To me it looks like there is something simple to conclude.
On the one hand, Sid likes the writing style of another. Fair
enough. That's good of him
to acknowledge and to communicate to the other.
But at the same time the CONTENT of that writing is according to
Sid, "garbage". Ouch.
A nasty critique, wouldn't you say ?
And there you have it.
I don't know how anyone else might wish it to be for them, but for
me I would much rather
another find my content of some value with no concern at all for the
style by which it was
presented. Having both style AND content appreciated is ideal of
course, but one can
always disregard or ignore style as long as content has appeal
value.
But all of this i's just my personal opinion. And one I felt like
sharing.
Isn't it wonderful to just .. you know ... share ?
JR
I would rather discuss topics (ACIM or anything) and share about
that,
So why don't you then ?
and
Post by Carrie
not get into personal opinions about the people writing them (or
someone else's judgement/ opinion about them)
Uh ?  Opinion ?  I quoted.  Specifically.  Then, objectively
analyzed.  Content vs style.
Where is the opinion in any of that ?
So who's now delving into personal opinions?  You about my post which
you just commented about ?
Can you be MORE hypocritical ?  I doubt it.
Post by Carrie
But, we can't control how anyone else
is, or seems to be. We can learn from it, even if that's just to accept it,
If one lives with such an attitude, "just to accept it", one NEVER
needs to
learn anything ever again.  If it is learned, it doesn't have to be
relearned with
every new experience, does it ?  Unless one is completely stupid and
doesn't
know how to retain what has been ... uh ... "learned".
Post by Carrie
and make the peaceful choice not to tie in with it. If someone has
already decided I am a certain way, they are probably always going
to see me that way, no matter what I do, or try to do to change it.
Why are you turning this into any discussion about " you " ?  There ya
go again.
Post by Carrie
As Sid has pointed out
to you, you can take it or leave it.-
Sid is ignorant by suggesting only limited choices.
He hasn;t pointed out other options.  And so I  chose one all by
myself.
So now the question has to be asked, why do you care, and why did you
feel you had to comment about it?  Why didn't you just ... let it be
without
getting into it ?  Why can't you take your own advice ?
reason is, your advice stinks and isn't worth following.  If it were,
it would
be followed.
So now .... go to ACIM and see what IT has to say about this recent
post of yours.
Think about it.
JR
 Okay, I will take my own advice and not write to you anymore after this.
Since you can't seem to see me in any way but the way you have been telling
me. That will just leave Sid here for you to write to, and you don't seem to
like him, either. I guess you can always write to yourself. Then if you
don't like what you read, you will know where to look to change it LOL- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
nah .... there's not enough on offer here to keep my interest so I'll
bow out and let you and Sid spend your days abusing and confusing each
other.

There was a time a vibrant community existed here. But that seems to
be no longer.

With what is left, I suppose that is the only evidence needed to
attest to the lack of quality.

Happy New Year. c ya

JR
Sidney Lambe
2010-12-27 17:53:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
I meant to say this in a reply to the relevant post from you, but
got distracted and then lost track of it.
I like your articles. Your writing style. Even if I don't quote or
reply to the entirety, I read it.
I see that "John" has replied to this.

I am not interested in his input here, so he's out of luck.

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
John Radgosky
2010-12-27 20:59:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
I meant to say this in a reply to the relevant post from you, but
got distracted and then lost track of it.
I like your articles. Your writing style. Even if I don't quote or
reply to the entirety, I read it.
I see that "John" has replied to this.
I am not interested in his input here, so he's out of luck.
Of course you're not. It was much too revealing for you to bear.
Idiot.

JR
HappyD
2010-12-29 12:19:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
I meant to say this in a reply to the relevant post from you, but
got distracted and then lost track of it.
I like your articles. Your writing style. Even if I don't quote or
reply to the entirety, I read it.
I see that "John" has replied to this.
I am not interested in his input here, so he's out of luck.
Of course you're not.  It was much too revealing for you to bear.
Idiot.
JR
Communication complete.

LOL
Carrie
2010-12-29 13:24:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by HappyD
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
I meant to say this in a reply to the relevant post from you, but
got distracted and then lost track of it.
I like your articles. Your writing style. Even if I don't quote or
reply to the entirety, I read it.
I see that "John" has replied to this.
I am not interested in his input here, so he's out of luck.
Of course you're not. It was much too revealing for you to bear.
Idiot.
JR
Communication complete.
"No one comes into our lives by acccident"
Post by HappyD
LOL
HappyD
2010-12-30 04:01:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by HappyD
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
I meant to say this in a reply to the relevant post from you, but
got distracted and then lost track of it.
I like your articles. Your writing style. Even if I don't quote or
reply to the entirety, I read it.
I see that "John" has replied to this.
I am not interested in his input here, so he's out of luck.
Of course you're not. It was much too revealing for you to bear.
Idiot.
JR
Communication complete.
   "No one comes into our lives by acccident"
Post by HappyD
LOL
Yes, life is a symphony of splendid wonder with every note perfectly
cast.
Carrie
2010-12-31 20:03:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by HappyD
Post by Carrie
Post by HappyD
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
I meant to say this in a reply to the relevant post from you, but
got distracted and then lost track of it.
I like your articles. Your writing style. Even if I don't quote
or reply to the entirety, I read it.
I see that "John" has replied to this.
I am not interested in his input here, so he's out of luck.
Of course you're not. It was much too revealing for you to bear.
Idiot.
JR
Communication complete.
"No one comes into our lives by acccident"
Post by HappyD
LOL
Yes, life is a symphony of splendid wonder with every note perfectly
cast.
Nice way of putting it.

Loading...