Discussion:
First lesson
(too old to reply)
HappyD
2011-01-01 17:09:07 UTC
Permalink
Introduction to A Course in Miracles Workbook ~ Lesson 1 Nothing I see
means anything.
A theoretical foundation such as the text provides is necessary as a
framework to make the exercises in this workbook meaningful. Yet it is
doing the exercises that will make the goal of the course possible. An
untrained mind can accomplish nothing. It is the purpose of this
workbook to train your mind to think along the lines the text sets
forth.

The exercises are very simple. They do not require a great deal of
time, and it does not matter where you do them. They need no
preparation. The training period is one year. The exercises are
numbered from 1 to 365. Do not undertake to do more than one set of
exercises a day.

The workbook is divided into two main sections, the first dealing with
the undoing of the way you see now, and the second with the
acquisition of true perception. With the exception of the review
periods, each day’s exercises are planned around one central idea,
which is stated first. This is followed by a description of the
specific procedures by which the idea for the day is to be applied.

The purpose of the workbook is to train your mind in a systematic way
to a different perception of everyone and everything in the world. The
exercises are planned to help you generalize the lessons, so that you
will understand that each of them is equally applicable to everyone
and everything you see.

Transfer of training in true perception does not proceed as does
transfer of the training of the world. If true perception has been
achieved in connection with any person, situation or event, total
transfer to everyone and everything is certain. On the other hand, one
exception held apart from true perception makes its accomplishments
anywhere impossible.

The only general rules to be observed throughout, then, are: First,
that the exercises be practiced with great specificity, as will be
indicated. This will help you to generalize the ideas involved to
every situation in which you find yourself, and to everyone and
everything in it. Second, be sure that you do not decide for yourself
that there are some people, situations or things to which the ideas
are inapplicable. This will interfere with transfer of training. The
very nature of true perception is that it has no limits. It is the
opposite of the way you see now.

The overall aim of the exercises is to increase your ability to extend
the ideas you will be practicing to include everything. This will
require no effort on your part. The exercises themselves meet the
conditions necessary for this kind of transfer.

Some of the ideas the workbook presents you will find hard to believe,
and others may seem to be quite startling. This does not matter. You
are merely asked to apply the ideas as you are directed to do. You are
not asked to judge them at all. You are asked only to use them. It is
their use that will give them meaning to you, and will show you that
they are true.

Remember only this; you need not believe the ideas, you need not
accept them, and you need not even welcome them. Some of them you may
actively resist. None of this will matter, or decrease their efficacy.
But do not allow yourself to make exceptions in applying the ideas the
workbook contains, and whatever your reactions to the ideas may be,
use them. Nothing more than that is required.

Lesson 1
Nothing I see in this room [on this street, from this window, in this
place] means anything.

Now look slowly around you, and practice applying this idea very
specifically to whatever you see:

This table does not mean anything.
This chair does not mean anything.
This hand does not mean anything
This foot does not mean anything.
This pen does not mean anything.

Then look farther away from your immediate area, and apply the idea to
a wider range:

That door does not mean anything.
That body does not mean anything.
That lamp does not mean anything.
That sign does not mean anything.
That shadow does not mean anything.

Notice that these statements are not arranged in any order, and make
no allowance for differences in the kinds of things to which they are
applied. That is the purpose of the exercise. The statement should
merely be applied to anything you see. As you practice the idea for
the day, use it totally indiscriminately. Do not attempt to apply it
to everything you see, for these exercises should not become
ritualistic. Only be sure that nothing you see is specifically
excluded. One thing is like another as far as the application of the
idea is concerned.

Each of the first three lessons should not be done more than twice a
day each, preferably morning and evening. Nor should they be attempted
for more than a minute or so, unless that entails a sense of hurry. A
comfortable sense of leisure is essential.
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-01 18:02:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by HappyD
Introduction to A Course in Miracles Workbook ~ Lesson 1 Nothing I see
means anything.
More nihilism from ACIM. That is simply nonssense.

Everything you see is a reflection of the state of your mind. We
all make our own realities with the nature of our beliefs.

That's what we are here to learn.

Our inner selves go to a great deal of effort to create this
experience for us.

The body is the soul in chemical clothes. The Spirit becomes Flesh.

Anyone who tells you that life isn't important and meaningful is
ignorant in the extreme and psychically poisonous.

[delete]

Sid

--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
John Radgosky
2011-01-01 20:31:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
Anyone who tells you that life isn't important and meaningful is
ignorant in the extreme and psychically poisonous.
Sid,

I'm unsure of your level of experience with the ACIM thought systeme,
so allow me to just say ...
The entire body of the course is not contained in lesson 1. Lesson 1
is but a start in a partricular process. Leading to a fuller
realization of just how important life IS and how MEANINGFUL the truth
of life is. Lesson 1 deals with the meaning we give to "everything"
based on our previous thoughts about them.

Life is a beautiful thing. And the course leads to an even FULLER
appreciation of it. What leads you to feel it is NOT that way in the
course writing ? I have a feeling I might know the answer, but I
would be guessing, which is not a wise thing to do.


JR
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-01 20:42:36 UTC
Permalink
On talk.religion.course-miracle, John Radgosky
On Jan 1, 1:02=A0pm, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
Anyone who tells you that life isn't important and meaningful
is ignorant in the extreme and psychically poisonous.
I'm unsure of your level of experience with the ACIM thought
systeme, so allow me to just say ... The entire body of the
course is not contained in lesson 1. Lesson 1 is but a start in
a partricular process.
A start towards ignorance and pain.
Leading to a fuller realization of just how important life IS
and how MEANINGFUL the truth of life is.
Every time I point out the nihilism of ACIM, I hear something
like that.

People aren't stupid. If you tell them that life stinks 200 times
and that it doesn't, 10 times, and then only when confronted with
the issue, they know what you really believe.

The real problem in life is not people who are lying to you.
It's people who sincerely believe poisonous falsehoods.


[delete]


Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
HappyD
2011-01-01 22:31:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, John Radgosky
On Jan 1, 1:02=A0pm, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
Anyone who tells you that life isn't important and meaningful
is ignorant in the extreme and psychically poisonous.
I'm unsure of your level of experience with the ACIM thought
systeme, so allow me to just say ... The entire body of the
course is not contained in lesson 1. Lesson 1 is but a start in
a partricular process.
A start towards ignorance and pain.
Leading to a fuller realization of just how important life IS
and how MEANINGFUL the truth of life is.
Every time I point out the nihilism of ACIM, I hear something
like that.
People aren't stupid. If you tell them that life stinks 200 times
and that it doesn't, 10 times, and then only when confronted with
the issue, they know what you really believe.
The real problem in life is not people who are lying to you.
It's people who sincerely believe poisonous falsehoods.
[delete]
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
Everything has meaning Sidney just not the meaning that I think it
has. It leads to the statement that I think I am in competition with
God over what things mean, which I am , but God is not. Only Gods
meaning is true and it is available to me if want to stop judging
things from my very limited perspective.
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-01 22:53:15 UTC
Permalink
On talk.religion.course-miracle, HappyD
On Jan 1, 12:42=A0pm, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, John Radgosky
On Jan 1, 1:02=3DA0pm, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
Anyone who tells you that life isn't important and
meaningful is ignorant in the extreme and psychically
poisonous.
I'm unsure of your level of experience with the ACIM thought
systeme, so allow me to just say ... The entire body of the
course is not contained in lesson 1. Lesson 1 is but a start
in a partricular process.
A start towards ignorance and pain.
Leading to a fuller realization of just how important life
IS and how MEANINGFUL the truth of life is.
Every time I point out the nihilism of ACIM, I hear something
like that.
People aren't stupid. If you tell them that life stinks 200
times and that it doesn't, 10 times, and then only when
confronted with the issue, they know what you really believe.
The real problem in life is not people who are lying to you .
It's people who sincerely believe poisonous falsehoods .
[delete]
Sid
Everything has meaning Sidney just not the meaning that I
think it has.
These ACIM folks just love vague doublespeak like the above. As
long as you can't be sure what they are talking about, they can
convey the impression of being enlightened.

The Truth can be stated simply and clearly, in plain English.
With no references whatsoever to anything Biblical.

And anyone who tells you that life is anything but wonderful
and necessary and Good, is a clueless loser.

[delete]

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
HappyD
2011-01-01 23:04:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, HappyD
On Jan 1, 12:42=A0pm, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, John Radgosky
On Jan 1, 1:02=3DA0pm, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
Anyone who tells you that life isn't important and
meaningful is ignorant in the extreme and psychically
poisonous.
I'm unsure of your level of experience with the ACIM thought
systeme, so allow me to just say ... The entire body of the
course is not contained in lesson 1. Lesson 1 is but a start
in a partricular process.
A start towards ignorance and pain.
Leading to a fuller realization of just how important life
IS and how MEANINGFUL the truth of life is.
Every time I point out the nihilism of ACIM, I hear something
like that.
People aren't stupid. If you tell them that life stinks 200
times and that it doesn't, 10 times, and then only when
confronted with the issue, they know what you really believe.
The real problem in life is not people who are lying to you  .
It's people who sincerely believe poisonous falsehoods       .
[delete]
Sid
Everything has meaning Sidney just not the meaning that I
think it has.
These ACIM folks just love vague doublespeak like the above. As
long as you can't be sure what they are talking about, they can
convey the impression of being enlightened.
The Truth can be stated simply and clearly, in plain English.
With no references whatsoever to anything Biblical.
And anyone who tells you that life is anything but wonderful
and necessary and Good, is a clueless loser.
[delete]
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
Oh Sid, your shouldn't be so hard on yourself, You'll get it someday.
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-01 23:30:11 UTC
Permalink
On talk.religion.course-miracle, HappyD <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
[delete]

I am not interested in what you have to say.

I've heard your foundational message and it is garbage.

Poisonous garbage.

Do feel free to ram it up the orifice you post from.

I just dumped your other posts to me.

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
HappyD
2011-01-02 20:31:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
[delete]
I am not interested in what you have to say.
I've heard your foundational message and it is garbage.
Poisonous garbage.
Do feel free to ram it up the orifice you post from.
I just dumped your other posts to me.
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
You are interested with what I have to say, and you wont be able to
stop yourself from responding, just as much as you can stop from
creating nice visuals, like the one above, for you and your hand to
enjoy.

You, your hand, your nice visuals, and all the high quality women that
you've turned down along the way. How do you find time to post so
much?
John Radgosky
2011-01-02 20:25:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, HappyD
On Jan 1, 12:42=A0pm, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, John Radgosky
On Jan 1, 1:02=3DA0pm, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
Anyone who tells you that life isn't important and
meaningful is ignorant in the extreme and psychically
poisonous.
I'm unsure of your level of experience with the ACIM thought
systeme, so allow me to just say ... The entire body of the
course is not contained in lesson 1. Lesson 1 is but a start
in a partricular process.
A start towards ignorance and pain.
Leading to a fuller realization of just how important life
IS and how MEANINGFUL the truth of life is.
Every time I point out the nihilism of ACIM, I hear something
like that.
People aren't stupid. If you tell them that life stinks 200
times and that it doesn't, 10 times, and then only when
confronted with the issue, they know what you really believe.
The real problem in life is not people who are lying to you  .
It's people who sincerely believe poisonous falsehoods       .
[delete]
Sid
Everything has meaning Sidney just not the meaning that I
think it has.
These ACIM folks just love vague doublespeak like the above. As
long as you can't be sure what they are talking about, they can
convey the impression of being enlightened.
The moment anyone talks universally (e.g. These ACIM folks) the
reader realizes the writer is coming from bigotry.

The responsible thing to do when something is not clear is to
ask for clarification UNTIL it becomes clear. Rejecting
based on lack of understanding is a sign of unwillingness to learn
and lack of respect for the other writer.

If you read something you genuinely believe to be doublespeak, ask
the writer to explain. You deserve to ask, and to be answered. But
the
writer does NOT deserve a response based on bigotry.
Post by Sidney Lambe
The Truth can be stated simply and clearly, in plain English.
With no references whatsoever to anything Biblical.
Well, the fact is, this IS an ACIM baced forum. What do you expect
here?
Discussions on knitting ?

The reality is , any writer who does wish to write from a Biblical
perspective
will do so. Why are you trying to force YOUR perspective into it ?
Either
be mature about it and "READ OUT" the Biblical reference, or stop
reading here
and go somewhere else where you WON"T see any Biblical writing.

EVERYTHING ... ALWAYS ... is all about HOW WE ALL CHOOSE to see
things.
And the good thing is, we all can choose a peaceful way.

And Sid, in case you're interested, for me personally, I believe most
of the Bible
is a bunch of bull .... God was a shit head bastard in the entire Old
Testament.
And the story of Jesus is debatable within some scholarly circles. So
I am not
defending the Biblical references. But neither am I "stuck" about
them. They are
what they are. And have no effect for me. Just to set the record
straight between
us.
Post by Sidney Lambe
And anyone who tells you that life is anything but wonderful
and necessary and Good, is a clueless loser.
It's not a game. No trophys. No records of standings. No playoffs.
No pennant to raise aloft. No cap to wear signifying who won and who
lost.

The actual reality is , we all want exactly the same thing. The form
is meaningless.

JR
r***@tahoe.blue
2011-01-04 02:37:16 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 12:25:27 -0800 (PST), John Radgosky
Post by John Radgosky
Well, the fact is, this IS an ACIM baced forum. What do you expect
here?
Discussions on knitting ?
My guess is that Sid does not find much interaction on the Wicca
newsgroup. Like the drunk looking under the street lamp for the keys
he dropped-- when he dropped them someplace else-- because the light's
better, he's here because he can get a rise out of someone.

Or, he finds the Course so threatening to his world view that he must
come here to do battle with it.I wonder how many students of the
Course are over at Wicca Central trying to convince the inhabitants of
how wrong they are. Again,I'd hazard a guess the answer is "none".

R
John Radgosky
2011-01-02 20:11:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, John Radgosky
On Jan 1, 1:02=A0pm, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
Anyone who tells you that life isn't important and meaningful
is ignorant in the extreme and psychically poisonous.
I'm unsure of your level of experience with the ACIM thought
systeme, so allow me to just say ... The entire body of the
course is not contained in lesson 1. Lesson 1 is but a start in
a partricular process.
A start towards ignorance and pain.
Leading to a fuller realization of just how important life IS
and how MEANINGFUL the truth of life is.
Every time I point out the nihilism of ACIM, I hear something
like that.
Every time ? If you're "stuck" on the idea of ACIM nihilism and
getting push back
EVERY time, there's a reason for that. Sounds like your research is
incomplete.
Post by Sidney Lambe
People aren't stupid. If you tell them that life stinks 200 times
and that it doesn't, 10 times, and then only when confronted with
the issue, they know what you really believe.
I happen to agree with you about only knowing for sure when
confronted.

But you keep restating that ACIM suggests life is anything LESS than
possessing
a HUGE opportunity to be perfect. Life is not that, yet. But it is
blessed with ALL potential
to BE that.

You would not be accepted well if you joined those sleeping under the
bridges at night
telling them how wonderful life is. Nor would you be appreciated if
you stepped into
the ghettos uttering the same. Or into the camps where refugees hide
from war, or
serious dislocation from catastrophic natural disaster.

Sorry Sid. Your claims contain much "disclaimer" clause in the small
print.

ACIM GUARANTEES only the best possible and eternal love and peace.
Guarantees.

No theory.
Post by Sidney Lambe
The real problem in life is not people who are lying to you.
It's people who sincerely believe poisonous falsehoods.
Sure. Are you lumping ACIM into that last sentence ?

JR
HappyD
2011-01-02 22:41:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, John Radgosky
On Jan 1, 1:02=A0pm, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
Anyone who tells you that life isn't important and meaningful
is ignorant in the extreme and psychically poisonous.
I'm unsure of your level of experience with the ACIM thought
systeme, so allow me to just say ... The entire body of the
course is not contained in lesson 1. Lesson 1 is but a start in
a partricular process.
A start towards ignorance and pain.
Leading to a fuller realization of just how important life IS
and how MEANINGFUL the truth of life is.
Every time I point out the nihilism of ACIM, I hear something
like that.
Every time ?  If you're "stuck" on the idea of ACIM nihilism and
getting push back
EVERY time, there's a reason  for that.  Sounds like your research is
incomplete.
Post by Sidney Lambe
People aren't stupid. If you tell them that life stinks 200 times
and that it doesn't, 10 times, and then only when confronted with
the issue, they know what you really believe.
I happen to agree with you about only knowing for sure when
confronted.
But you keep restating that ACIM suggests life is anything LESS than
possessing
a HUGE opportunity to be perfect.  Life is not that, yet.  But it is
blessed with ALL potential
to BE that.
You would not be accepted well if you joined those sleeping under the
bridges at night
telling them how wonderful life is.  Nor would you be appreciated if
you stepped into
the ghettos uttering the same.  Or into the camps where refugees hide
from war, or
serious dislocation from catastrophic natural disaster.
Sorry Sid.  Your claims contain much "disclaimer" clause in the small
print.
ACIM GUARANTEES only the best possible and eternal love and peace.
Guarantees.
No theory.
Post by Sidney Lambe
The real problem in life is not people who are lying to you.
It's people who sincerely believe poisonous falsehoods.
Sure.  Are you lumping ACIM into that last sentence ?
JR
Very nicely said JR. I'm have an inclination to respond this way but
feel it is just a waste of time with Sidney, Proven by his lack of
response to this well thought post. I don't think he is interested in
any kind of real discussions regarding the Course. Although your post
was appreciated by me and who knows maybe it got Sidney to stop and
think for a moment.
Carrie
2011-01-03 01:54:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by HappyD
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, John Radgosky
On Jan 1, 1:02=A0pm, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
Anyone who tells you that life isn't important and meaningful
is ignorant in the extreme and psychically poisonous.
I'm unsure of your level of experience with the ACIM thought
systeme, so allow me to just say ... The entire body of the
course is not contained in lesson 1. Lesson 1 is but a start in
a partricular process.
A start towards ignorance and pain.
Leading to a fuller realization of just how important life IS
and how MEANINGFUL the truth of life is.
Every time I point out the nihilism of ACIM, I hear something
like that.
Every time ? If you're "stuck" on the idea of ACIM nihilism and
getting push back
EVERY time, there's a reason for that. Sounds like your research is
incomplete.
Post by Sidney Lambe
People aren't stupid. If you tell them that life stinks 200 times
and that it doesn't, 10 times, and then only when confronted with
the issue, they know what you really believe.
I happen to agree with you about only knowing for sure when
confronted.
But you keep restating that ACIM suggests life is anything LESS than
possessing
a HUGE opportunity to be perfect. Life is not that, yet. But it is
blessed with ALL potential
to BE that.
You would not be accepted well if you joined those sleeping under the
bridges at night
telling them how wonderful life is. Nor would you be appreciated if
you stepped into
the ghettos uttering the same. Or into the camps where refugees hide
from war, or
serious dislocation from catastrophic natural disaster.
Sorry Sid. Your claims contain much "disclaimer" clause in the small
print.
ACIM GUARANTEES only the best possible and eternal love and peace.
Guarantees.
No theory.
Post by Sidney Lambe
The real problem in life is not people who are lying to you.
It's people who sincerely believe poisonous falsehoods.
Sure. Are you lumping ACIM into that last sentence ?
JR
Very nicely said JR. I'm have an inclination to respond this way but
feel it is just a waste of time with Sidney, Proven by his lack of
response to this well thought post. I don't think he is interested in
any kind of real discussions regarding the Course. Although your post
was appreciated by me and who knows maybe it got Sidney to stop and
think for a moment.
You are probably right, but then little Voice says to me... "how can *I*
decide what someone else needs and has come into my [online]life for at this
time?
It's probably some lesson for me in patience or tolerance because after
awhile it's not anyway interesting. Just when I think he is into having a
discussion of some kind, he reverts to the rude, crude insults like he's
trying to pick a fight. Or he's trying to defend me, or make me mad at the
others here (I have known for many years and don't plan to turn into enemies
to feed someone else's games)
His choice, like everyone else's. Not up to me to judge anyone, just
accept them the way they are, but I can also make choices around that. From
a place of peace. At one time I probably would have gotten into more back
and forth arguing, try ing to make the other wrong, and put downs, but now
it's just kind of boring. Round and round on the merry-go-round.
I think I'm making progress LOL
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-03 02:16:01 UTC
Permalink
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Carrie <***@charter.net> wrote:
[delete]

Why do you waste your time with this ideological thug? (wannabe
guru/priest)

He doesn't want to help you, he wants you to become dependent
on his interpretations of ACIM.

He wants you to accept him over your Inner Teacher.

This is a scam at least as old as prostitution.


Sid
HappyD
2011-01-03 02:32:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
[delete]
Why do you waste your time with this ideological thug? (wannabe
guru/priest)
He doesn't want to help you, he wants you to become dependent
on his interpretations of ACIM.
He wants you to accept him over your Inner Teacher.
This is a scam at least as old as prostitution.
Sid
Ha ha I more listen to hers than she ever does mine. Sorry your so
wrong Sid.
Carrie
2011-01-03 03:10:42 UTC
Permalink
wrote: [delete]
Why do you waste your time with this ideological thug? (wannabe
guru/priest)
He doesn't want to help you, he wants you to become dependent
on his interpretations of ACIM.
He wants you to accept him over your Inner Teacher.
This is a scam at least as old as prostitution.
Sid
I like people who have Happy in their name.
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-03 03:41:40 UTC
Permalink
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Carrie
Post by Carrie
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Carrie
Why do you waste your time with this ideological thug?
(wannabe guru/priest)
He doesn't want to help you, he wants you to become dependent
on his interpretations of ACIM.
He wants you to accept him over your Inner Teacher.
This is a scam at least as old as prostitution.
Sid
I like people who have Happy in their name.
Even when it's a lie?

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
HappyD
2011-01-03 05:02:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Carrie
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Carrie
Why do you waste your time with this ideological thug?
(wannabe guru/priest)
He doesn't want to help you, he wants you to become dependent
on his interpretations of ACIM.
He wants you to accept him over your Inner Teacher.
This is a scam at least as old as prostitution.
Sid
   I like people who have Happy in their name.
Even when it's a lie?
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
I don't lie Sid. How about you, about all the women that you've turned
down? Wanna come clean about that?
Carrie
2011-01-03 13:46:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by HappyD
I don't lie Sid. How about you, about all the women that you've turned
down? Wanna come clean about that?
Maybe this is a man thing....
territorial?
I can't relate.
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-03 05:55:13 UTC
Permalink
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Sidney Lambe <***@somewhere.invalid> wrote:

Dear 'HappyD'

Do you have something you want to say to me?

Too bad. Fucking punks like you are not allowed to open your
mouth in my presence.

Do you not see that I am making you look like a feeb? You read
everything I post and I don't read anything you post.

It's like fighting someone who just stands there and lets
you beat their face in.

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
HappyD
2011-01-03 06:12:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
Dear 'HappyD'
Do you have something you want to say to me?
Too bad. Fucking punks like you are not allowed to open your
mouth in my presence.
Do you not see that I am making you look like a feeb? You read
everything I post and I don't read anything you post.
It's like fighting someone who just stands there and lets
you beat their face in.
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
Makes a lot of sense to me sidney.
HappyD
2011-01-03 06:16:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by HappyD
Post by Sidney Lambe
Dear 'HappyD'
Do you have something you want to say to me?
Too bad. Fucking punks like you are not allowed to open your
mouth in my presence.
Do you not see that I am making you look like a feeb? You read
everything I post and I don't read anything you post.
It's like fighting someone who just stands there and lets
you beat their face in.
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
Makes a lot of sense to me sidney.
Oh, NOT! just incase you think it did.

(LOL)
Carrie
2011-01-03 13:45:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Carrie
Post by Carrie
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Carrie
Why do you waste your time with this ideological thug?
(wannabe guru/priest)
He doesn't want to help you, he wants you to become dependent
on his interpretations of ACIM.
He wants you to accept him over your Inner Teacher.
This is a scam at least as old as prostitution.
Sid
I like people who have Happy in their name.
Even when it's a lie?
I like people who have "Sid" in their name, too.
Even if that's a lie.
Post by Sidney Lambe
Sid
HappyD
2011-01-03 16:20:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Carrie
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Carrie
Why do you waste your time with this ideological thug?
(wannabe guru/priest)
He doesn't want to help you, he wants you to become dependent
on his interpretations of ACIM.
He wants you to accept him over your Inner Teacher.
This is a scam at least as old as prostitution.
Sid
   I like people who have Happy in their name.
Even when it's a lie?
   I like people who have "Sid" in their name, too.
    Even if that's a lie.
Post by Sidney Lambe
Sid
Sorry Sid but Carrie says that its a lie that she likes your name, at
least thats my reality.
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-03 16:34:58 UTC
Permalink
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Carrie
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Carrie
Post by Carrie
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Carrie
Why do you waste your time with this ideological thug?
(wannabe guru/priest)
He doesn't want to help you, he wants you to become
dependent on his interpretations of ACIM.
He wants you to accept him over your Inner Teacher.
This is a scam at least as old as prostitution.
Sid
I like people who have Happy in their name.
Even when it's a lie?
I like people who have "Sid" in their name, too Even if
that's a lie
The first lesson is honesty. Without it, you have no
chance of enlightment or a good life.

You can lie to others all you want. As long as
you know you are doing it and why. But you
can't lie to yourself. Or hide from yourself.

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
Mike
2011-01-06 19:12:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by HappyD
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, John Radgosky
On Jan 1, 1:02=A0pm, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
Anyone who tells you that life isn't important and meaningful
is ignorant in the extreme and psychically poisonous.
I'm unsure of your level of experience with the ACIM thought
systeme, so allow me to just say ... The entire body of the
course is not contained in lesson 1. Lesson 1 is but a start in
a partricular process.
A start towards ignorance and pain.
Leading to a fuller realization of just how important life IS
and how MEANINGFUL the truth of life is.
Every time I point out the nihilism of ACIM, I hear something
like that.
Every time ? If you're "stuck" on the idea of ACIM nihilism and
getting push back
EVERY time, there's a reason for that. Sounds like your research is
incomplete.
Post by Sidney Lambe
People aren't stupid. If you tell them that life stinks 200 times
and that it doesn't, 10 times, and then only when confronted with
the issue, they know what you really believe.
I happen to agree with you about only knowing for sure when
confronted.
But you keep restating that ACIM suggests life is anything LESS than
possessing
a HUGE opportunity to be perfect. Life is not that, yet. But it is
blessed with ALL potential
to BE that.
You would not be accepted well if you joined those sleeping under the
bridges at night
telling them how wonderful life is. Nor would you be appreciated if
you stepped into
the ghettos uttering the same. Or into the camps where refugees hide
from war, or
serious dislocation from catastrophic natural disaster.
Sorry Sid. Your claims contain much "disclaimer" clause in the small
print.
ACIM GUARANTEES only the best possible and eternal love and peace.
Guarantees.
No theory.
Post by Sidney Lambe
The real problem in life is not people who are lying to you.
It's people who sincerely believe poisonous falsehoods.
Sure. Are you lumping ACIM into that last sentence ?
JR
Very nicely said JR. I'm have an inclination to respond this way but
feel it is just a waste of time with Sidney, Proven by his lack of
response to this well thought post. I don't think he is interested in
any kind of real discussions regarding the Course. Although your post
was appreciated by me and who knows maybe it got Sidney to stop and
think for a moment.
  You are probably right, but then  little Voice says to me... "how can *I*
decide what someone else needs and has come into my [online]life for at this
time?
   It's probably some lesson for me in patience or tolerance because after
awhile it's not anyway interesting. Just when I think he is into having a
discussion of some kind, he reverts to the rude, crude insults like he's
trying to pick a fight. Or he's trying to defend me, or make me mad at the
others here (I have known for many years and don't plan to turn into enemies
to feed someone else's games)
   His choice, like everyone else's.  Not up to me to judge anyone, just
accept them the way they are, but I can also make choices around that. From
a place of peace. At one time I probably would have gotten into more back
and forth arguing, try ing to make the other wrong, and put downs, but now
it's just kind of boring.  Round and round on the  merry-go-round.
   I think I'm making progress LOL- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Carrie, does Sidney Lambe (obviously a nom de guerre) remind
you of anyone?
HappyD
2011-01-06 19:39:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by HappyD
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, John Radgosky
On Jan 1, 1:02=A0pm, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
Anyone who tells you that life isn't important and meaningful
is ignorant in the extreme and psychically poisonous.
I'm unsure of your level of experience with the ACIM thought
systeme, so allow me to just say ... The entire body of the
course is not contained in lesson 1. Lesson 1 is but a start in
a partricular process.
A start towards ignorance and pain.
Leading to a fuller realization of just how important life IS
and how MEANINGFUL the truth of life is.
Every time I point out the nihilism of ACIM, I hear something
like that.
Every time ? If you're "stuck" on the idea of ACIM nihilism and
getting push back
EVERY time, there's a reason for that. Sounds like your research is
incomplete.
Post by Sidney Lambe
People aren't stupid. If you tell them that life stinks 200 times
and that it doesn't, 10 times, and then only when confronted with
the issue, they know what you really believe.
I happen to agree with you about only knowing for sure when
confronted.
But you keep restating that ACIM suggests life is anything LESS than
possessing
a HUGE opportunity to be perfect. Life is not that, yet. But it is
blessed with ALL potential
to BE that.
You would not be accepted well if you joined those sleeping under the
bridges at night
telling them how wonderful life is. Nor would you be appreciated if
you stepped into
the ghettos uttering the same. Or into the camps where refugees hide
from war, or
serious dislocation from catastrophic natural disaster.
Sorry Sid. Your claims contain much "disclaimer" clause in the small
print.
ACIM GUARANTEES only the best possible and eternal love and peace.
Guarantees.
No theory.
Post by Sidney Lambe
The real problem in life is not people who are lying to you.
It's people who sincerely believe poisonous falsehoods.
Sure. Are you lumping ACIM into that last sentence ?
JR
Very nicely said JR. I'm have an inclination to respond this way but
feel it is just a waste of time with Sidney, Proven by his lack of
response to this well thought post. I don't think he is interested in
any kind of real discussions regarding the Course. Although your post
was appreciated by me and who knows maybe it got Sidney to stop and
think for a moment.
  You are probably right, but then  little Voice says to me... "how can *I*
decide what someone else needs and has come into my [online]life for at this
time?
   It's probably some lesson for me in patience or tolerance because after
awhile it's not anyway interesting. Just when I think he is into having a
discussion of some kind, he reverts to the rude, crude insults like he's
trying to pick a fight. Or he's trying to defend me, or make me mad at the
others here (I have known for many years and don't plan to turn into enemies
to feed someone else's games)
   His choice, like everyone else's.  Not up to me to judge anyone, just
accept them the way they are, but I can also make choices around that. From
a place of peace. At one time I probably would have gotten into more back
and forth arguing, try ing to make the other wrong, and put downs, but now
it's just kind of boring.  Round and round on the  merry-go-round.
   I think I'm making progress LOL- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
  Carrie, does Sidney Lambe (obviously a nom de guerre) remind
  you of anyone?
Interestingly these type of men seem to be attracted to her. Maybe its
because she gives them the time-of-day, being a Course student. Most
women would just tell him to drop dead. I think carrie is at that
point.
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-06 20:29:10 UTC
Permalink
On talk.religion.course-miracle, HappyD <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
[delete]
Post by HappyD
Interestingly these type of men seem to be attracted to her. Maybe its
because she gives them the time-of-day, being a Course student. Most
women would just tell him to drop dead. I think carrie is at that
point.
She may be a woman, but you are a bitch.
And a stinking troll. You are talking to your
own sockpuppet, you pathetic loser.

I'm here. You live with it.

There is absolutely nothing you can post that will
bother me in any way. You are just another loser
spinning feeble textual illusions on the Usenet.

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
Carrie
2011-01-06 20:06:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by HappyD
Post by Sidney Lambe
On talk.religion.course-miracle, John Radgosky
On Jan 1, 1:02=A0pm, Sidney Lambe
Post by Sidney Lambe
Anyone who tells you that life isn't important and meaningful
is ignorant in the extreme and psychically poisonous.
I'm unsure of your level of experience with the ACIM thought
systeme, so allow me to just say ... The entire body of the
course is not contained in lesson 1. Lesson 1 is but a start in
a partricular process.
A start towards ignorance and pain.
Leading to a fuller realization of just how important life IS
and how MEANINGFUL the truth of life is.
Every time I point out the nihilism of ACIM, I hear something
like that.
Every time ? If you're "stuck" on the idea of ACIM nihilism and
getting push back
EVERY time, there's a reason for that. Sounds like your research is
incomplete.
Post by Sidney Lambe
People aren't stupid. If you tell them that life stinks 200 times
and that it doesn't, 10 times, and then only when confronted with
the issue, they know what you really believe.
I happen to agree with you about only knowing for sure when
confronted.
But you keep restating that ACIM suggests life is anything LESS than
possessing
a HUGE opportunity to be perfect. Life is not that, yet. But it is
blessed with ALL potential
to BE that.
You would not be accepted well if you joined those sleeping under the
bridges at night
telling them how wonderful life is. Nor would you be appreciated if
you stepped into
the ghettos uttering the same. Or into the camps where refugees hide
from war, or
serious dislocation from catastrophic natural disaster.
Sorry Sid. Your claims contain much "disclaimer" clause in the small
print.
ACIM GUARANTEES only the best possible and eternal love and peace.
Guarantees.
No theory.
Post by Sidney Lambe
The real problem in life is not people who are lying to you.
It's people who sincerely believe poisonous falsehoods.
Sure. Are you lumping ACIM into that last sentence ?
JR
Very nicely said JR. I'm have an inclination to respond this way but
feel it is just a waste of time with Sidney, Proven by his lack of
response to this well thought post. I don't think he is interested in
any kind of real discussions regarding the Course. Although your post
was appreciated by me and who knows maybe it got Sidney to stop and
think for a moment.
  You are probably right, but then  little Voice says to me... "how can *I*
decide what someone else needs and has come into my [online]life for at this
time?
   It's probably some lesson for me in patience or tolerance because after
awhile it's not anyway interesting. Just when I think he is into having a
discussion of some kind, he reverts to the rude, crude insults like he's
trying to pick a fight. Or he's trying to defend me, or make me mad at the
others here (I have known for many years and don't plan to turn into enemies
to feed someone else's games)
   His choice, like everyone else's.  Not up to me to judge anyone, just
accept them the way they are, but I can also make choices around that. From
a place of peace. At one time I probably would have gotten into more back
and forth arguing, try ing to make the other wrong, and put downs, but now
it's just kind of boring.  Round and round on the  merry-go-round.
   I think I'm making progress LOL- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
  Carrie, does Sidney Lambe (obviously a nom de guerre) remind
  you of anyone?-
Just reading this now, and I agree, you are right.
Not that there can't be more than one lilke that in the world.
Also, I've been thinking about this more, and didn't know where
to put it in these discusions. I didn't seem important enough for it's
own post and thread. But, everyone does have a right to post here if
they want, however way they want. It's a free and open to all
newsgroup. Those who don't agree or like it can learn ways to deal
with it. We can't always get away from people who don't seem to want
peace, and can't always get them away from us. And, the course does
say, what isn't love is fear and a call for love.Took me a long time
to realize this, and, the idea the most loving, peaceful, whatever way
might be to just leave the person alone. Sometimes trying to be
friendly and get along makes it worse. Everyone seems to have their
own agenda, in form.
Carrie
2011-01-06 20:09:40 UTC
Permalink
  Carrie, does Sidney Lambe (obviously a nom de guerre) remind
  you of anyone?-
You know he uses the word "nihilism" quite a bit and that's
something John used to do. I put the word in search on this group and
it kept coming up in JL's posts.
Mike
2011-01-06 21:42:06 UTC
Permalink
  Carrie, does Sidney Lambe (obviously a nom de guerre) remind
  you of anyone?-
   You know he uses the word "nihilism" quite a bit and that's
something John used to do. I put the word in search on this group and
it kept coming up in JL's posts.
The word I remember John using the most was cupcake. The
definitions of nihilism don't really fit ACIM very well.

a : a viewpoint that traditional values and beliefs are unfounded
and that existence is senseless and useless b : a doctrine that denies
any objective ground of truth and especially of moral truths
2a : a doctrine or belief that conditions in the social organization
are so bad as to make destruction desirable for its own sake
independent of any constructive program or possibility

My response is that ACIM never says existence is senseless and
useless. The philosophy is more of a grow where you are planted
approach. It says that truth is ONLY objective, the only reality.
And
ACIM's teaching that anger is never justified voids the possibility
of
destroying society.

Silly argument that nihilism thing.
HappyD
2011-01-06 23:40:55 UTC
Permalink
  Carrie, does Sidney Lambe (obviously a nom de guerre) remind
  you of anyone?-
   You know he uses the word "nihilism" quite a bit and that's
something John used to do. I put the word in search on this group and
it kept coming up in JL's posts.
  The word I remember John using the most was cupcake.  The
definitions of nihilism don't really fit ACIM very well.
  a : a viewpoint that traditional values and beliefs are unfounded
and that existence is senseless and useless b : a doctrine that denies
any objective ground of truth and especially of moral truths
2a : a doctrine or belief that conditions in the social organization
are so bad as to make destruction desirable for its own sake
independent of any constructive program or possibility
 My response is that ACIM never says existence is senseless and
 useless.  The philosophy is more of a grow where you are planted
 approach.  It says that truth is ONLY objective, the only reality.
And
 ACIM's teaching that anger is never justified voids the possibility
of
 destroying society.
  Silly argument that nihilism thing.
John also use to call Carrie an "internet slut" chronically. He used
the phrase white trash a lot as well. Being part mexican that
statement could have seemed like a pretty racist thing to say. I
remember one night I got him to have a complete meltdown and leave the
NG for a while by staying on the racist thing. (lol) He really lost it
on that one and could not stop replying to my every assertion. There
are definitely a lot of similarities between the two of them.
Mike
2011-01-07 15:18:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by HappyD
  Carrie, does Sidney Lambe (obviously a nom de guerre) remind
  you of anyone?-
   You know he uses the word "nihilism" quite a bit and that's
something John used to do. I put the word in search on this group and
it kept coming up in JL's posts.
  The word I remember John using the most was cupcake.  The
definitions of nihilism don't really fit ACIM very well.
  a : a viewpoint that traditional values and beliefs are unfounded
and that existence is senseless and useless b : a doctrine that denies
any objective ground of truth and especially of moral truths
2a : a doctrine or belief that conditions in the social organization
are so bad as to make destruction desirable for its own sake
independent of any constructive program or possibility
 My response is that ACIM never says existence is senseless and
 useless.  The philosophy is more of a grow where you are planted
 approach.  It says that truth is ONLY objective, the only reality.
And
 ACIM's teaching that anger is never justified voids the possibility
of
 destroying society.
  Silly argument that nihilism thing.
John also use to call Carrie an "internet slut" chronically. He used
the phrase white trash a lot as well. Being part mexican that
statement could have seemed like a pretty racist thing to say. I
remember one night I got him to have a complete meltdown and leave the
NG for a while by staying on the racist thing. (lol) He really lost it
on that one and could not stop replying to my every assertion.  There
are definitely a lot of similarities between the two of them.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
This ng has attracted more than it's share of eccentrics (read
nut jobs) over the years. I think we could all identify most of
them. Losing it is part of John's persona I think. Oh, well. The
subject matter is going to attract haters. As Carrie likes to say -
good opportunity to learn.
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-07 15:28:58 UTC
Permalink
[delete]
Post by Mike
This ng has attracted more than it's share of eccentrics
(read nut jobs) over the years. I think we could all identify
most of them. Losing it is part of John's persona I think.
Oh, well. The subject matter is going to attract haters. As
Carrie likes to say - good opportunity to learn.
"Eccentrics" and "nutjobs" being anyone with the intelligence
to criticize the metaphysical garbage these pathetic wannabee
gurus peddle.

You are just sinking your own ship. If you were 1/10 as
evoloved as you pretend to be, you would be at least
attempting to emulate Jesus and would treat me with
respect, regardless.

The truth is, that you are just another nasty, power-hungry,
religious bigot.

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
Mike
2011-01-07 15:37:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
[delete]
  This ng has attracted more than it's share of eccentrics
  (read nut jobs) over the years. I think we could all identify
  most of them. Losing it is part of John's persona I think.
  Oh, well. The subject matter is going to attract haters. As
  Carrie likes to say - good opportunity to learn.
"Eccentrics" and "nutjobs" being anyone with the intelligence
to criticize the metaphysical garbage these pathetic wannabee
gurus peddle.
You are just sinking your own ship. If you were 1/10 as
evoloved as you pretend to be, you would be at least
attempting to emulate Jesus and would treat me with
respect, regardless.
The truth is, that you are just another nasty, power-hungry,
religious bigot.
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
This is the last post I shall address to you. You thrive on
attention. I shall not give it to you.
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-07 15:41:59 UTC
Permalink
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Mike <***@yahoo.com> wrote:

[delete]

Nasty, power-hungry religious bigots peddling metaphysical garbage
are not allowed to open their sewer mouths in my presence.

I've told him this a dozen times. He's just not very bright.

Sid
John Radgosky
2011-01-07 16:58:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
[delete]
  This ng has attracted more than it's share of eccentrics
  (read nut jobs) over the years. I think we could all identify
  most of them. Losing it is part of John's persona I think.
  Oh, well. The subject matter is going to attract haters. As
  Carrie likes to say - good opportunity to learn.
"Eccentrics" and "nutjobs" being anyone with the intelligence
to criticize the metaphysical garbage these pathetic wannabee
gurus peddle.
You are just sinking your own ship. If you were 1/10 as
evoloved as you pretend to be, you would be at least
attempting to emulate Jesus and would treat me with
respect, regardless.
The truth is, that you are just another nasty, power-hungry,
religious bigot.
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
hey, stop that .. you said I was the power hungry one around here who
wanted to dominate.

You can't just go and start giving that distinction to somebody else.

Never do that again without my permission or I'll have to stop by and
smack you upside the head.

How often were you dropped as a baby ?

You're quite the bozo, henna ?

JR
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-07 17:39:15 UTC
Permalink
On talk.religion.course-miracle, John Radgosky <***@yahoo.com> wrote:
[delete]

Is this creepy religiuos bigot quoting more poisonous spiritual
garbage from A Course In Mediocrity?

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-07 00:01:09 UTC
Permalink
On talk.religion.course-miracle, HappyD <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
[delete]

I had a bitchy kid sister when I was little. No need to read
anything this loser posts to his sockpuppet. I could write the
script. So could any third grader.

I'm here, little boy. If you don't like it, do feel free to write
your congressperson.

Meanwhile, you have to wear a gag when you are in my space, and
there's nothing you can do about it.

A warning to any newcomers: his enlightment is illusory. He's
just another religious fanatic parroting from some book he wants
to believe contains nothing but Truth.

The above applies to everyone here, though less so to Carrie than
the guys (if there's more than one of them).

ACIM has several fatal flaws and is almost as poisonous as
mainstream Christianity, which is the religion held by the
authors that obviously corrupted the channeling.

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
Carrie
2011-01-01 18:11:13 UTC
Permalink
http://www.acimradio.net/wkbk/001_ACIMRadio_UrWork_NothingISeeMeansAnything.wma
Post by HappyD
Introduction to A Course in Miracles Workbook ~ Lesson 1 Nothing I see
means anything.
A theoretical foundation such as the text provides is necessary as a
framework to make the exercises in this workbook meaningful. Yet it is
doing the exercises that will make the goal of the course possible. An
untrained mind can accomplish nothing. It is the purpose of this
workbook to train your mind to think along the lines the text sets
forth.
The exercises are very simple. They do not require a great deal of
time, and it does not matter where you do them. They need no
preparation. The training period is one year. The exercises are
numbered from 1 to 365. Do not undertake to do more than one set of
exercises a day.
The workbook is divided into two main sections, the first dealing with
the undoing of the way you see now, and the second with the
acquisition of true perception. With the exception of the review
periods, each day’s exercises are planned around one central idea,
which is stated first. This is followed by a description of the
specific procedures by which the idea for the day is to be applied.
The purpose of the workbook is to train your mind in a systematic way
to a different perception of everyone and everything in the world. The
exercises are planned to help you generalize the lessons, so that you
will understand that each of them is equally applicable to everyone
and everything you see.
Transfer of training in true perception does not proceed as does
transfer of the training of the world. If true perception has been
achieved in connection with any person, situation or event, total
transfer to everyone and everything is certain. On the other hand, one
exception held apart from true perception makes its accomplishments
anywhere impossible.
The only general rules to be observed throughout, then, are: First,
that the exercises be practiced with great specificity, as will be
indicated. This will help you to generalize the ideas involved to
every situation in which you find yourself, and to everyone and
everything in it. Second, be sure that you do not decide for yourself
that there are some people, situations or things to which the ideas
are inapplicable. This will interfere with transfer of training. The
very nature of true perception is that it has no limits. It is the
opposite of the way you see now.
The overall aim of the exercises is to increase your ability to extend
the ideas you will be practicing to include everything. This will
require no effort on your part. The exercises themselves meet the
conditions necessary for this kind of transfer.
Some of the ideas the workbook presents you will find hard to believe,
and others may seem to be quite startling. This does not matter. You
are merely asked to apply the ideas as you are directed to do. You are
not asked to judge them at all. You are asked only to use them. It is
their use that will give them meaning to you, and will show you that
they are true.
Remember only this; you need not believe the ideas, you need not
accept them, and you need not even welcome them. Some of them you may
actively resist. None of this will matter, or decrease their efficacy.
But do not allow yourself to make exceptions in applying the ideas the
workbook contains, and whatever your reactions to the ideas may be,
use them. Nothing more than that is required.
Lesson 1
Nothing I see in this room [on this street, from this window, in this
place] means anything.
Now look slowly around you, and practice applying this idea very
This table does not mean anything.
This chair does not mean anything.
This hand does not mean anything
This foot does not mean anything.
This pen does not mean anything.
Then look farther away from your immediate area, and apply the idea to
That door does not mean anything.
That body does not mean anything.
That lamp does not mean anything.
That sign does not mean anything.
That shadow does not mean anything.
Notice that these statements are not arranged in any order, and make
no allowance for differences in the kinds of things to which they are
applied. That is the purpose of the exercise. The statement should
merely be applied to anything you see. As you practice the idea for
the day, use it totally indiscriminately. Do not attempt to apply it
to everything you see, for these exercises should not become
ritualistic. Only be sure that nothing you see is specifically
excluded. One thing is like another as far as the application of the
idea is concerned.
Each of the first three lessons should not be done more than twice a
day each, preferably morning and evening. Nor should they be attempted
for more than a minute or so, unless that entails a sense of hurry. A
comfortable sense of leisure is essential.
Lee Flynn
2011-01-07 02:27:29 UTC
Permalink
Hi everyone, happy New Year! ...

Thoughts on the 1st Review of the workbook lessons, and its
single-paragraph, capsule review of Lesson One..

W-pI.51.1. (1) Nothing I see means anything.

2 The reason this is so is that I see nothing, and nothing
has no meaning. 3 It is necessary that I recognize this,
that I may learn to see. 4 What I think I see now is taking
the place of vision. 5 I must let it go by realizing it
has no meaning, so that vision may take its place.

As we look over that first lesson title, it's a wonderful line to begin
the review with imo. It's a wonderful line to begin the workbook with!

"Nothing I see means anything."

It introduces a dilemma and it establishes two key concepts to
frame that dilemma. Sight and meaning. The dilemma is that my
sight is presently divorced from meaning.

Note please, that I'm NOT at all being told there is nothing
meaningful TO see. Only that the meaning is lacking in what
I now see.

The lesson identifies the solution as restoring my sight of the
meaning<ful>, through vision. But it begins by explaining why
nothing I see means anything, in sentence 2, where I'm told
it's because I see "nothing," and "nothing has no meaning."
Now if I start with that last half of sentence 2, I find a definition
of "nothing"ness -- as that which "has no <meaning>." And as
we recognize from the Course, all things created have meaning
as an essential attribute given in their creation. If what I see has
no meaning, then what I 'see' is illusory. Thus I 'see' nothing.

The third sentence says it's necessary that I recognize this, in
order that I may "learn to see." So I'm introduced here to the
concept of "learning to see" as the remedy for the bedrock
dilemma, "Nothing I see means anything." I'm assured that
I can <learn> to see.. once I recognize that I don't yet see,
at all. Learning to see is where I will find meaning.

In the 4th sentence this is clarified. I'm introduced to the
concept of vision.

"4 What I think I see now is taking the place of vision."

Nothing <I see> means anything, BECAUSE vision has been
replaced by what I think I see now. This 4th sentence also
introduces the idea that vision is not just the act or faculty
of seeing correctly, but also includes the meaning imparted
(or restored) by corrected sight. This is conveyed by the
sentence structure itself, where on one side we have
<what I think I see now>, and on the other side we have
vision. Vision represents the meaningful alternative to the
meaninglessness of <what I think I see now>.

The concluding sentence reads,

"5 I must let <it> go by realizing <it> has no meaning,
so that vision may take <its> place."

Ok, I must let go of <what I think I see now> by realizing <what
I think I see now> has no meaning.. SO THAT vision may *take
the place* of <what I think I see now.> So we have vision again
representing not only a corrected faculty of sight, but signifying
what that corrected faculty of sight will meaningfully behold.

Sight and meaning are presently divorced, then.. but vision will
restore that meaning and lead to wholly different understanding
and experience of everyone and everything.

Check !

~ Lee
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-07 02:39:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lee Flynn
Hi everyone, happy New Year! ...
Thoughts on the 1st Review of the workbook lessons, and its
single-paragraph, capsule review of Lesson One..
W-pI.51.1. (1) Nothing I see means anything.
2 The reason this is so is that I see nothing, and nothing
has no meaning. 3 It is necessary that I recognize this,
that I may learn to see. 4 What I think I see now is taking
the place of vision. 5 I must let it go by realizing it
has no meaning, so that vision may take its place.
As we look over that first lesson title, it's a wonderful line to begin
the review with imo. It's a wonderful line to begin the workbook with!
"Nothing I see means anything."
It introduces a dilemma and it establishes two key concepts to
frame that dilemma. Sight and meaning. The dilemma is that my
sight is presently divorced from meaning.
Note please, that I'm NOT at all being told there is nothing
meaningful TO see. Only that the meaning is lacking in what
I now see.
The lesson identifies the solution as restoring my sight of the
meaning<ful>, through vision. But it begins by explaining why
nothing I see means anything, in sentence 2, where I'm told
it's because I see "nothing," and "nothing has no meaning."
Now if I start with that last half of sentence 2, I find a definition
of "nothing"ness -- as that which "has no <meaning>." And as
we recognize from the Course, all things created have meaning
as an essential attribute given in their creation. If what I see has
no meaning, then what I 'see' is illusory. Thus I 'see' nothing.
The third sentence says it's necessary that I recognize this, in
order that I may "learn to see." So I'm introduced here to the
concept of "learning to see" as the remedy for the bedrock
dilemma, "Nothing I see means anything." I'm assured that
I can <learn> to see.. once I recognize that I don't yet see,
at all. Learning to see is where I will find meaning.
In the 4th sentence this is clarified. I'm introduced to the
concept of vision.
"4 What I think I see now is taking the place of vision."
Nothing <I see> means anything, BECAUSE vision has been
replaced by what I think I see now. This 4th sentence also
introduces the idea that vision is not just the act or faculty
of seeing correctly, but also includes the meaning imparted
(or restored) by corrected sight. This is conveyed by the
sentence structure itself, where on one side we have
<what I think I see now>, and on the other side we have
vision. Vision represents the meaningful alternative to the
meaninglessness of <what I think I see now>.
The concluding sentence reads,
"5 I must let <it> go by realizing <it> has no meaning,
so that vision may take <its> place."
Ok, I must let go of <what I think I see now> by realizing <what
I think I see now> has no meaning.. SO THAT vision may *take
the place* of <what I think I see now.> So we have vision again
representing not only a corrected faculty of sight, but signifying
what that corrected faculty of sight will meaningfully behold.
Sight and meaning are presently divorced, then.. but vision will
restore that meaning and lead to wholly different understanding
and experience of everyone and everything.
Check !
~ Lee
Good grief. Yet another one of these. Psuedo-enlightnment is
is a complex affair. Has to be, or they couldn't charge for
it.

In fact, enlightment is quite simple: a very effective first step
is to sit quietly and close your eyes. Tell yourself that you are
going to get in touch with the energetic fountains of your being.
Then free yourself from concepts and look within.

It isn't easy, and it can be a while before you get anything but
relaxed and peaceful, but if you persist, you will have some
amazing experiences and _your_ next step will be revealed to you
when you are ready.

That's it. Real Truth is simple and free. And no one can make
it real for you but you.

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
Mike
2011-01-07 03:03:40 UTC
Permalink
Hi everyone,  happy New Year! ...
Thoughts on the 1st Review of the workbook lessons, and its
single-paragraph, capsule review of Lesson One..
     W-pI.51.1. (1) Nothing I see means anything.
     2 The reason this is so is that I see nothing, and nothing
     has no meaning. 3 It is necessary that I recognize this,
     that I may learn to see. 4 What I think I see now is taking
     the place of vision. 5 I must let it  go by realizing it
     has no meaning, so that vision may take its place.
As we look over that first lesson title, it's a wonderful line to begin
the review with imo. It's a wonderful line to begin the workbook with!
    "Nothing I see means anything."
It introduces a dilemma and it establishes two key concepts to
frame that dilemma. Sight and meaning. The dilemma is that my
sight is presently divorced from meaning.
   Note please, that I'm NOT at all being told there is nothing
   meaningful TO see. Only that the meaning is lacking in what
   I now see.
The lesson identifies the solution as restoring my sight of the
meaning<ful>, through vision. But it begins by explaining why
nothing I see means anything, in sentence 2, where I'm told
it's because I see "nothing," and "nothing has no meaning."
Now if I start with that last half of sentence 2, I find a definition
of "nothing"ness -- as that which "has no <meaning>." And as
we recognize from the Course, all things created have meaning
as an essential attribute given in their creation. If what I see has
no meaning, then what I 'see' is illusory. Thus I 'see' nothing.
The third sentence says it's necessary that I recognize this, in
order that I may "learn to see." So I'm introduced here to the
concept of "learning to see" as the remedy for the bedrock
dilemma, "Nothing I see means anything." I'm assured that
I can <learn> to see.. once I recognize that I don't yet see,
at all. Learning to see is where I will find meaning.
In the 4th sentence this is clarified. I'm introduced to the
concept of vision.
    "4 What I think I see now is taking the place of vision."
Nothing <I see> means anything, BECAUSE vision has been
replaced by what I think I see now. This 4th sentence also
introduces the idea that vision is not just the act or faculty
of seeing correctly, but also includes the meaning imparted
(or restored) by corrected sight. This is conveyed by the
sentence structure itself, where on one side we have
<what I think I see now>, and on the other side we have
vision. Vision represents the meaningful alternative to the
meaninglessness of <what I think I see now>.
The concluding sentence reads,
    "5  I must let <it> go by realizing <it> has no meaning,
    so that vision may take <its> place."
Ok, I must let go of <what I think I see now> by realizing <what
I think I see now> has no meaning.. SO THAT vision may *take
the place* of <what I think I see now.> So we have vision again
representing not only a corrected faculty of sight, but signifying
what that corrected faculty of sight will meaningfully behold.
Sight and meaning are presently divorced, then..  but vision will
restore that meaning and lead to wholly different understanding
and experience of everyone and everything.
Check !
~ Lee
How have you been, Lee? Long time no speaky.
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-07 03:31:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike
Hi everyone, =A0happy New Year! ...
Thoughts on the 1st Review of the workbook lessons, and its
single-paragraph, capsule review of Lesson One..
=A0 =A0 =A0W-pI.51.1. (1) Nothing I see means anything.
=A0 =A0 =A02 The reason this is so is that I see nothing, and nothing
=A0 =A0 =A0has no meaning. 3 It is necessary that I recognize this,
=A0 =A0 =A0that I may learn to see. 4 What I think I see now is taking
=A0 =A0 =A0the place of vision. 5 I must let it =A0go by realizing it
=A0 =A0 =A0has no meaning, so that vision may take its place.
As we look over that first lesson title, it's a wonderful line to begin
the review with imo. It's a wonderful line to begin the workbook with!
=A0 =A0 "Nothing I see means anything."
It introduces a dilemma and it establishes two key concepts to
frame that dilemma. Sight and meaning. The dilemma is that my
sight is presently divorced from meaning.
=A0 =A0Note please, that I'm NOT at all being told there is nothing
=A0 =A0meaningful TO see. Only that the meaning is lacking in what
=A0 =A0I now see.
The lesson identifies the solution as restoring my sight of the
meaning<ful>, through vision. But it begins by explaining why
nothing I see means anything, in sentence 2, where I'm told
it's because I see "nothing," and "nothing has no meaning."
Now if I start with that last half of sentence 2, I find a definition
of "nothing"ness -- as that which "has no <meaning>." And as
we recognize from the Course, all things created have meaning
as an essential attribute given in their creation. If what I see has
no meaning, then what I 'see' is illusory. Thus I 'see' nothing.
The third sentence says it's necessary that I recognize this, in
order that I may "learn to see." So I'm introduced here to the
concept of "learning to see" as the remedy for the bedrock
dilemma, "Nothing I see means anything." I'm assured that
I can <learn> to see.. once I recognize that I don't yet see,
at all. Learning to see is where I will find meaning.
In the 4th sentence this is clarified. I'm introduced to the
concept of vision.
=A0 =A0 "4 What I think I see now is taking the place of vision."
Nothing <I see> means anything, BECAUSE vision has been
replaced by what I think I see now. This 4th sentence also
introduces the idea that vision is not just the act or faculty
of seeing correctly, but also includes the meaning imparted
(or restored) by corrected sight. This is conveyed by the
sentence structure itself, where on one side we have
<what I think I see now>, and on the other side we have
vision. Vision represents the meaningful alternative to the
meaninglessness of <what I think I see now>.
The concluding sentence reads,
=A0 =A0 "5 =A0I must let <it> go by realizing <it> has no meaning,
=A0 =A0 so that vision may take <its> place."
Ok, I must let go of <what I think I see now> by realizing <what
I think I see now> has no meaning.. SO THAT vision may *take
the place* of <what I think I see now.> So we have vision again
representing not only a corrected faculty of sight, but signifying
what that corrected faculty of sight will meaningfully behold.
Sight and meaning are presently divorced, then.. =A0but vision will
restore that meaning and lead to wholly different understanding
and experience of everyone and everything.
Check !
~ Lee
How have you been, Lee? Long time no speaky.
Errrr.....You are supposed to be stomping gurus, you stupid fuck.
Not sucking up to them.

Note that only stinking trolls identify themselves with a common
first name. This is because they are afraid that the people they
abuse will track them down and stomp their punk asses.

This is another measure of their cluelessness: why would anyone
bother to track someone down who wasn't a threat of any kind?

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
Mike
2011-01-07 15:03:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
Hi everyone, =A0happy New Year! ...
Thoughts on the 1st Review of the workbook lessons, and its
single-paragraph, capsule review of Lesson One..
=A0 =A0 =A0W-pI.51.1. (1) Nothing I see means anything.
=A0 =A0 =A02 The reason this is so is that I see nothing, and nothing
=A0 =A0 =A0has no meaning. 3 It is necessary that I recognize this,
=A0 =A0 =A0that I may learn to see. 4 What I think I see now is taking
=A0 =A0 =A0the place of vision. 5 I must let it =A0go by realizing it
=A0 =A0 =A0has no meaning, so that vision may take its place.
As we look over that first lesson title, it's a wonderful line to begin
the review with imo. It's a wonderful line to begin the workbook with!
=A0 =A0 "Nothing I see means anything."
It introduces a dilemma and it establishes two key concepts to
frame that dilemma. Sight and meaning. The dilemma is that my
sight is presently divorced from meaning.
=A0 =A0Note please, that I'm NOT at all being told there is nothing
=A0 =A0meaningful TO see. Only that the meaning is lacking in what
=A0 =A0I now see.
The lesson identifies the solution as restoring my sight of the
meaning<ful>, through vision. But it begins by explaining why
nothing I see means anything, in sentence 2, where I'm told
it's because I see "nothing," and "nothing has no meaning."
Now if I start with that last half of sentence 2, I find a definition
of "nothing"ness -- as that which "has no <meaning>." And as
we recognize from the Course, all things created have meaning
as an essential attribute given in their creation. If what I see has
no meaning, then what I 'see' is illusory. Thus I 'see' nothing.
The third sentence says it's necessary that I recognize this, in
order that I may "learn to see." So I'm introduced here to the
concept of "learning to see" as the remedy for the bedrock
dilemma, "Nothing I see means anything." I'm assured that
I can <learn> to see.. once I recognize that I don't yet see,
at all. Learning to see is where I will find meaning.
In the 4th sentence this is clarified. I'm introduced to the
concept of vision.
=A0 =A0 "4 What I think I see now is taking the place of vision."
Nothing <I see> means anything, BECAUSE vision has been
replaced by what I think I see now. This 4th sentence also
introduces the idea that vision is not just the act or faculty
of seeing correctly, but also includes the meaning imparted
(or restored) by corrected sight. This is conveyed by the
sentence structure itself, where on one side we have
<what I think I see now>, and on the other side we have
vision. Vision represents the meaningful alternative to the
meaninglessness of <what I think I see now>.
The concluding sentence reads,
=A0 =A0 "5 =A0I must let <it> go by realizing <it> has no meaning,
=A0 =A0 so that vision may take <its> place."
Ok, I must let go of <what I think I see now> by realizing <what
I think I see now> has no meaning.. SO THAT vision may *take
the place* of <what I think I see now.> So we have vision again
representing not only a corrected faculty of sight, but signifying
what that corrected faculty of sight will meaningfully behold.
Sight and meaning are presently divorced, then.. =A0but vision will
restore that meaning and lead to wholly different understanding
and experience of everyone and everything.
Check !
~ Lee
  How have you been, Lee?  Long time no speaky.
Errrr.....You are supposed to be stomping gurus, you stupid fuck.
Not sucking up to them.
Note that only stinking trolls identify themselves with a common
first name. This is because they are afraid that the people they
abuse will track them down and stomp their punk asses.
This is another measure of their cluelessness: why would anyone
bother to track someone down who wasn't a threat of any kind?
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hi, Katie.
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-07 15:19:09 UTC
Permalink
On talk.religion.course-miracle, Mike <***@yahoo.com> wrote:

The "gurustomper" who is a wannabe guru himself.

This kind of blatant hypocrisy is very typical of the ACIM
believers I have encountered.

[delete]

This fucking punk is not allowed to open his anus mouth in my
space.

He's just the sort of religious bigot that Carrie has made
the mistake of trusting.

Hey "Mike". If you don't like what I do, you are always
welcome to eat shit.

The taste shouldn't bother you a bit, considering what
comes out of your mouth on a regular basis.

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
Mike
2011-01-07 15:23:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
The "gurustomper" who is a wannabe guru himself.
This kind of blatant hypocrisy is very typical of the ACIM
believers I have encountered.
[delete]
This fucking punk is not allowed to open his anus mouth in my
space.
He's just the sort of religious bigot that Carrie has made
the mistake of trusting.
Hey "Mike". If you don't like what I do, you are always
welcome to eat shit.
The taste shouldn't bother you a bit, considering what
comes out of your mouth on a regular basis.
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
Then you will not be responding to me anymore. Cool.
HappyD
2011-01-07 16:23:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
The "gurustomper" who is a wannabe guru himself.
This kind of blatant hypocrisy is very typical of the ACIM
believers I have encountered.
[delete]
This fucking punk is not allowed to open his anus mouth in my
space.
He's just the sort of religious bigot that Carrie has made
the mistake of trusting.
Hey "Mike". If you don't like what I do, you are always
welcome to eat shit.
The taste shouldn't bother you a bit, considering what
comes out of your mouth on a regular basis.
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
  Then you will not be responding to me anymore.  Cool.
Most of what Sidney posts does not come to pass.
Mike
2011-01-07 16:25:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
The "gurustomper" who is a wannabe guru himself.
This kind of blatant hypocrisy is very typical of the ACIM
believers I have encountered.
[delete]
This fucking punk is not allowed to open his anus mouth in my
space.
He's just the sort of religious bigot that Carrie has made
the mistake of trusting.
Hey "Mike". If you don't like what I do, you are always
welcome to eat shit.
The taste shouldn't bother you a bit, considering what
comes out of your mouth on a regular basis.
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
  Then you will not be responding to me anymore.  Cool.
Most of what Sidney posts does not come to pass.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
lol
John Radgosky
2011-01-07 17:00:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
The "gurustomper" who is a wannabe guru himself.
This kind of blatant hypocrisy is very typical of the ACIM
believers I have encountered.
[delete]
This fucking punk is not allowed to open his anus mouth in my
space.
He's just the sort of religious bigot that Carrie has made
the mistake of trusting.
Hey "Mike". If you don't like what I do, you are always
welcome to eat shit.
The taste shouldn't bother you a bit, considering what
comes out of your mouth on a regular basis.
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
  Then you will not be responding to me anymore.  Cool.
Most of what Sidney posts does not come to pass.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I'm sure the story about the dog poop in the park was based on his/her/
it's personal experiences.
HappyD
2011-01-07 18:40:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
The "gurustomper" who is a wannabe guru himself.
This kind of blatant hypocrisy is very typical of the ACIM
believers I have encountered.
[delete]
This fucking punk is not allowed to open his anus mouth in my
space.
He's just the sort of religious bigot that Carrie has made
the mistake of trusting.
Hey "Mike". If you don't like what I do, you are always
welcome to eat shit.
The taste shouldn't bother you a bit, considering what
comes out of your mouth on a regular basis.
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
When I first read this i swear I thought it said:

"Hey "Mike". If you don't like it do what I do, you are always
welcome to eat shit."

LOL

Sidney your attempted control over others in this NG is pretty
hilarious.
Sidney Lambe
2011-01-07 18:48:07 UTC
Permalink
On talk.religion.course-miracle, HappyD <***@hotmail.com> wrote:

Folks, just observe these people. Do they act enlightened, or do
they act like nasty religious bigots everywhere.

Do you want to be like them?

I won't even let this human scum open his mouth in my presence.

Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocence
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) com
HappyD
2011-01-07 19:04:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sidney Lambe
Folks, just observe these people. Do they act enlightened, or do
they act like nasty religious bigots everywhere.
Do you want to be like them?
I won't even let this human scum open his mouth in my presence.
Sid
--
I am a Magickal Being
My Second Spell is Innocencehttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (AT) gmail (DOT) comm
Don't listen to this poster new Course students come and we will give
you the right information to help you on your way to enlightenment.
Sidney is a mental patient and a notorius internet troll. Do not ever
listen to him! He will try to trick you into letting him give you a
blowjob.
Deborah
2011-01-07 19:40:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lee Flynn
Hi everyone, happy New Year! ...
Thoughts on the 1st Review of the workbook lessons, and its
single-paragraph, capsule review of Lesson One..
W-pI.51.1. (1) Nothing I see means anything.
2 The reason this is so is that I see nothing, and nothing
has no meaning. 3 It is necessary that I recognize this,
that I may learn to see. 4 What I think I see now is taking
the place of vision. 5 I must let it go by realizing it
has no meaning, so that vision may take its place.
It is interesting that the author says if we could do any one of the
lessons perfectly, we would have done them all. Suggests each lesson
is a mini-course. Except the catch is "perfectly".

Imo, the course works within the parameter of healed perception,
though it acknowledges there is much beyond that. Sustaining direct
communication with God, it says, is not a realistic goal.

I like Mike's phrase "Grow where you're planted".

My own mini-course is found in the words "The only aspect of time that
is eternal is now".

Deborah

Loading...